Iraq has rejected a proposal to stage its World Cup qualifier against Palestine in Jerusalem, prompting concerns about competition integrity. The Iraqi Football Association demands a different venue, citing unfair proximity in Group B standings. While FIFA suggested Amman as a neutral site, Palestine continues to assert its right to host matches on its territory, despite logistical hurdles.
Iraq’s decision to dismiss Jerusalem as the venue for its upcoming World Cup qualifier against Palestine has raised concerns regarding the integrity of the competition. The Iraqi Football Association (IFA) has rejected a proposal for the match to be held outside Jerusalem and requested an alternative location instead. The last international soccer match played in the Palestinian territories occurred in October 2019, with subsequent matches hosted at neutral venues.
Palestine is set to face Iraq on March 25 in a Group B match for the third round of Asian qualifiers. Following Iraq’s rejection of hosting the match in Palestinian territory, FIFA suggested Amman as a neutral site. However, the IFA objected, arguing that playing in Amman contradicts FIFA’s regulations over neutral venues due to the proximity of competing teams.
The IFA expressed its concerns, stating: “This decision raises serious questions about the integrity and fairness of the competition, given the highly competitive nature in Group B.” Iraq currently sits second in the group with 11 points, closely chased by Jordan, while South Korea leads. Only the top two teams in the group will qualify for the 2026 World Cup finals.
In response to Iraq’s rejection, the Palestine Football Association (PFA) lamented the decision and emphasized its commitment to hosting home games. The PFA highlighted that FIFA and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) had approved Faisal Al-Husseini International Stadium for the match, pending Iraqi concurrence. They expressed surprise at the unilateral decision of the IFA.
Despite expressing interest in playing in Palestine, the IFA cited the absence of VAR technology at the stadium as a key reason for its refusal. Requests for comments from FIFA and the AFC remain pending. Palestine stands last in Group B with just three points from six matches, while Iraq looks to improve from their previous World Cup performance in 1986.
In summary, Iraq’s refusal to host the World Cup qualifying match against Palestine in Jerusalem highlights ongoing geopolitical tensions affecting sports. While Palestine seeks recognition and opportunities to play at home, logistical and regulatory challenges complicate these aspirations. Both the IFA and PFA are navigating complex scenarios regarding venue selection and fairness in competition, particularly as the race for World Cup qualification intensifies.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
