Indonesia is appealing a French court’s decision to seize its diplomatic assets, linked to a lawsuit by Navayo Int’l AG over unpaid bills. The Indonesian government alleges fraud in the contract work with Navayo and emphasizes that diplomatic properties should be immune from seizure under international law. A court hearing scheduled for May offers an opportunity to contest the ruling.
Indonesia is set to appeal a French court’s decision to seize its diplomatic assets in connection with a lawsuit initiated by Liechtenstein-based Navayo International AG. The dispute began in 2016 when Indonesia’s Defense Ministry contracted Navayo for a satellite project, which later stalled, leading to a $16 million lawsuit over unpaid invoices. An arbitration court in Singapore ruled in favor of Navayo, with Indonesia now liable to pay approximately $24.1 million by November 22, 2024, accruing daily penalties thereafter.
The Indonesian government has delayed payment upon discovering alleged fraud in Navayo’s work. In response, Navayo sought a French court to authorize the seizure of properties rented by Indonesian diplomats in Paris, a request that was granted. Recently, Indonesian legal affairs minister Yusril Ihza Mahendra urged French authorities to reconsider the seizure, arguing it was unjust and contravened international norms. This claim is grounded in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which protects diplomatic assets from seizure.
Yusril expressed disappointment that the French court ruling occurred without adequate representation of Indonesia’s position, labeling it a violation of international judicial practices. He emphasized the potential negative implications this ruling could pose for diplomatic immunity worldwide. Yusril confirmed that Indonesia has employed a seasoned French attorney to advocate in this matter as the upcoming court hearing in May presents an opportunity for Indonesia to present its case adequately.
Furthermore, Indonesia is actively pursuing legal action against Navayo for alleged fraudulent activity, having found that the company completed only a small fraction of the contracted work. The Indonesian government plans to issue an Interpol red notice against Navayo, seeking accountability for the discrepancies between the project’s claims and the actual conducted work.
In summary, Indonesia’s appeal against the French court’s decision to seize its diplomatic assets is rooted in concerns over fraudulent practices by Navayo. The legal discourse highlights the significance of diplomatic immunity as per international treaties. Indonesia’s proactive legal strategy, including hiring experienced counsel and pursuing Navayo for fraud, underscores the country’s commitment to protect its diplomatic integrity.
Original Source: jakartaglobe.id
