Iran summoned British and German diplomats over a UNHRC draft resolution, criticising their ‘provocative’ actions. The Iranian foreign ministry condemned their historical human rights records and compliance with sanctions against Iran, emphasizing that both countries fail to advocate genuinely for human rights.
Iran has summoned diplomatic representatives from Britain and Germany in response to a draft resolution discussed at the 58th session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC). Forouzandeh Vadiati, the Director General of Human Rights and Women Affairs at the Iranian foreign ministry, expressed Iran’s strong dissatisfaction with the perceived provocative actions of these nations regarding the extension of the Special Rapporteur’s mandate and the Fact-Finding Mission on Iran.
In discussions with the German ambassador, Vadiati condemned the exploitation of the UNHRC, accusing foreign governments of manipulating human rights issues to exert pressure on Iran. She highlighted Germany’s controversial past, specifically referencing its provision of chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein during the 1980s Iran-Iraq War.
Vadiati also addressed the British charge d’affaires, reminding him of the UK’s historical interventions in Iran and its persistent anti-Iran stance at the UNHRC. She criticized the UK’s “unconstructive measures,” stating that this behavior diminishes the credibility of UN-affiliated human rights institutions.
Additionally, Vadiati condemned both the UK and Germany for supporting Israel’s actions against Palestinians and complying with US sanctions imposed on Iran. She emphasized that both countries lack the legitimacy to advocate for human rights under these circumstances. The envoys assured that they would relay Iran’s strong objections back to their governments.
In summary, Iran’s summoning of the British and German envoys underscores its discontent with their recent actions at the UNHRC, particularly regarding the human rights resolutions. The Iranian government called out both nations for their historical actions and current political stances, highlighting significant concerns over integrity in human rights advocacy. This incident illustrates ongoing tensions surrounding the narratives of human rights across international engagements.
Original Source: ifpnews.com
