Argentina’s President Javier Milei appointed two judges to the Supreme Court via decree, bypassing Congress during its recess. This move has faced criticism for undermining judicial independence. The nominations, temporary until Senate approval, highlight tensions in Argentina’s governance regarding executive power over judicial appointments.
Argentina’s President Javier Milei has appointed two Supreme Court judges via decree, circumventing Congress during its summer break. The administration justified this approach by stating that the Supreme Court cannot function effectively with only three justices. Last year, Milei nominated federal judge Ariel Lijo and lawyer Manuel García-Mansilla, but the Senate had not approved them due to Milei’s coalition holding only seven of the 72 seats.
The appointment of Ariel Lijo raises concerns due to his previous allegations of conspiracy and money laundering. Critics have accused Milei of undermining the independence of the judiciary, indicating that the president cannot bypass institutional protocols simply because of Senate obstacles. Human Rights Watch referred to Milei’s actions as a significant threat to judicial independence since Argentina’s return to democracy.
Milei, who campaigned against the political elite, surprised many by nominating Lijo, a candidate linked to entrenched political interests. The appointments are temporary, lasting until November 30, when Senate approval will be needed for the judges to remain in their positions. Critics argue that using decrees for judicial appointments during recess is an overreach of presidential authority.
Legal experts argue that such decrees should be used restrictively and not as replacements for constitutional procedures, as this could endanger the constitutional framework and public rights. The situation highlights potential tensions between executive power and legislative processes in Argentina’s governance.
Milei’s maneuver to appoint Supreme Court judges without Senate approval has sparked significant controversy. Critics view it as a threat to judicial independence, especially given the allegations against one of the nominees, Ariel Lijo. This situation underscores a critical balance between executive authority and legislative responsibility within Argentina’s democratic framework.
Original Source: apnews.com
