Trump’s Gaza takeover plan poses significant dilemmas for Egypt, which must balance its dependency on U.S. foreign aid and domestic stability while addressing Palestinian rights. Recent discussions among Arab leaders aim to develop a viable alternative plan to avoid ethnic cleansing in Gaza and reinforce Egypt’s role as a mediator. The reconstruction of Gaza will require substantial international funding, particularly from Gulf nations, due to the magnitude of destruction and ongoing aid issues.
Egypt finds itself in a challenging position regarding the proposed U.S. takeover of Gaza, presented by President Donald Trump. During a recent meeting with Jordan’s King Abdullah II, Trump proposed transferring the governing authority to the U.S. and relocating Palestinians to Egypt and Jordan, raising concerns about international and internal political stability for Egypt, given its reliance on U.S. foreign aid.
King Abdullah anticipates that Arab nations will collaborate to develop an alternative plan to rebuild Gaza, one that avoids ethnic cleansing. Egypt has confirmed its commitment to this effort, aiming to ensure that Palestinians remain in their homeland while also seeking cooperation with the U.S. to address the broader Palestinian issue.
The ramifications of Trump’s plan could significantly impact Egypt, especially as it navigates ongoing economic issues such as debt and inflation compounded by pressures from U.S. aid cuts. Historically, the U.S. has provided Egypt with over $85 billion in aid since 1946, influencing bilateral relations profoundly.
Despite the importance of U.S. assistance, Egypt must maintain its political stability, which could be jeopardized by any forced displacement of Palestinians. As noted by journalist Hossam El-Hamalawy, there is deep-seated political sentiment among Egyptians concerning the Palestinian cause, which complicates domestic support for such an initiative.
In response to the perceived threat, President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has stated he will refrain from engaging in talks with the U.S. until discourse around Palestinians’ displacement ceases. Further complicating negotiations, Egypt is coordinating with other Arab states to construct a unified counter-proposal that preserves Palestinian rights while addressing humanitarian concerns.
Egypt could potentially welcome injured Palestinians and their families, similar to Jordan’s approach, depending on cooperative arrangements amongst Arab nations. Additionally, experts suggest that while Egypt may not be able to provide substantial financial aid, it can still play a key role as a mediator in the reconstruction efforts.
The reconstruction of Gaza, extensively damaged by Israeli strikes, will not receive direct compensation from Israel, demanding financial support from regional partners. Egypt’s construction companies are prepared to participate in rebuilding efforts, contingent upon approval from the Israeli government to facilitate the entry of needed materials.
The Gulf Cooperation Council has already pledged significant humanitarian aid to Gaza, but the scope of Gaza’s destruction necessitates further financial support from these countries to aid extensive reconstruction efforts. Amid ongoing political tensions and the fragile ceasefire status in Gaza, urgent action is required from Arab nations to achieve lasting resolution.
The situation for Egypt in light of Trump’s Gaza proposal is precarious, balancing dependency on U.S. aid with the necessity for political stability and support for Palestinian rights. Egypt seeks to work collaboratively with Arab nations on a counter-plan to Trump’s initiative, focusing on humanitarian efforts while navigating the complexities of regional politics. The success of any reconstruction efforts will largely depend on international support, especially from Gulf countries, amid the backdrop of ongoing challenges in the region.
Original Source: www.aljazeera.com
