Iran’s UN envoy criticizes a UNSC meeting as an interference in Iran-IAEA cooperation, aligning it with failed maximum pressure policies. He insists the issues discussed are within IAEA jurisdiction and expresses concern over the politicization of technical matters. Iravani reaffirms Iran’s peaceful nuclear intentions, rejecting claims of non-compliance, and insists on the need for accountability for those violating the JCPOA and related resolutions.
Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Sa’eed Iravani, condemned a recent UNSC meeting, describing it as an unwarranted interference in Iran’s constructive engagement with the IAEA. He warned that the meeting perpetuates a failed policy of maximum pressure against Iran and warned of potential damage to the Security Council’s credibility. Iravani contended that the topics discussed were primarily technical and within IAEA’s authority, already covered in the prior week’s Board meeting in Vienna.
Iravani addressed the private UNSC meeting, emphasizing that this discussion was a misuse of the Council for political agendas rather than a legitimate conversation on nuclear non-proliferation. He criticized the actions as a dangerous precedent undermining the Council’s function, asserting there was no justification for its involvement in these matters, which belong solely to the IAEA’s jurisdiction.
The Iranian ambassador articulated a staunch objection to the politically motivated claims from the U.S., U.K., and France regarding Iran’s nuclear program. He highlighted the U.S.’s lack of adherence to its commitments under the JCPOA and its unilateral imposition of sanctions that violate international law. Iravani pointed out that these nations contributed to the current tensions by shifting their responsibilities rather than upholding their agreements.
Iravani reiterated Iran’s status following the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA in May 2018, which he claims was a violation of UN mandates. Despite such provocations, he stated Iran maintained its commitments under the JCPOA for over a year, firmly asserting that the nation has not breached the agreement itself.
Reaffirming Iran’s peaceful nuclear intentions, Iravani claimed that the country has not violated the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) or any related Safeguards commitments. He argued against claims that Iran’s nuclear activities deviate from legal frameworks, explaining that enrichment levels are not restricted by the NPT but rather by the JCPOA, an agreement he accused the U.S. of sabotaging.
Iravani denounced the politicization of technical issues by certain states and asserted that the IAEA’s agency must maintain independence from external political pressures. He emphasized Iran’s unwavering stance against Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) and affirmed its commitment to utilizing nuclear technology for peaceful purposes only.
Iran remains open to diplomacy, engaging in discussions with European partners and other JCPOA members like Russia and China to navigate concerns related to sanctions and nuclear matters. Continuous negotiations reaffirmed the emphasis on diplomacy over coercion, with clarity that Iran will not negotiate under duress or compromising principles.
Finally, Iravani underlined that accountability is essential for resolving current tensions. He stressed that those responsible for abandoning their commitments, imposing sanctions, and undermining diplomacy must be held accountable. Iran is poised to defend its rights vigorously, demanding adherence to the principles established by the Council and advocating for a respectful diplomatic approach moving forward.
In conclusion, Iran’s ambassador highlighted the unjust nature of the recent UNSC meeting, labeling it an interference in Iran-IAEA relations while reaffirming the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear intentions. Iravani condemned the politicization of discussions surrounding technical issues and emphasized the importance of accountability for those infringing upon international agreements. Iran reaffirms its commitment to diplomacy, seeking constructive dialogues while resisting coercion and dictation.
Original Source: ifpnews.com
