Argentina, under President Javier Milei, intends to withdraw from the WHO, citing considerable disagreements over health management during the COVID-19 pandemic. This decision mirrors the U.S. withdrawal initiated by Trump and reflects concerns about the organization’s influence, particularly regarding China. The financial implications of Argentina’s exit are minimal compared to the potential impact of the U.S. departure.
Argentina’s government, led by President Javier Milei, has announced its decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO). This decision arises from notable disagreements about health management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Milei’s office cited concerns similar to those expressed by the United States when it began its own withdrawal process from the WHO under President Donald Trump.
The move by Argentina follows a trend established by the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO, triggered by dissatisfaction with the organization’s handling of global health issues, specifically during the pandemic. President Milei has made remarks suggesting respect for Trump, indicating a potential ideological alignment between the two leaders regarding international health governance. Argentina’s annual contribution to the WHO is minimal compared to the U.S., which raises questions about the potential impact of its withdrawal.
In summary, Argentina’s planned exit from the WHO reflects significant dissatisfaction with the organization and aligns with the U.S. perspective. While both nations express similar criticisms, the financial repercussions vary greatly due to the differences in their contributions. The broader implications of such exits may influence other leaders sharing Trump’s viewpoint to consider similar actions.
Original Source: newscentral.africa
