The Tumaini Peace Talks in Nairobi highlighted international support for South Sudan’s peace process. Key topics included the recognition of historical leaders, alignment with the 2018 Peace Agreement, calls for inclusivity from various factions, and the importance of timely negotiations to achieve a peace agreement within a specified two-week timeline. Observations made suggest optimism for transformative change amidst concerns about the potential for prolonged discussions over protocol renegotiations.
On December 4, 2024, I attended the Tumaini Peace Talks in Nairobi as a private citizen, witnessing significant participation from both regional and international dignitaries. This large turnout amid global crises indicates that there is still a strong international commitment to promoting peace in South Sudan. I was particularly moved by Gen. Kuol Manyang’s opening remarks, which honored key historical figures in the liberation struggle, fostering a sense of unity necessary for the nation’s future.
A noticeable shift in the Revitalized Transitional Government of National Unity’s (RTGoNU) stance regarding the Tumaini Talks was evident. Initially viewed as supplementary to the 2018 Peace Agreement (R-ARCSS), RTGoNU now acknowledges the need for alignment between both processes. Gen. Pagan Amum emphasized the importance of building lasting peace on previous accords, highlighting the need for complementary rather than competing initiatives.
There was a broader call for inclusivity in the peace process, particularly involving Gen. Thomas Cirillo and Gen. Simon Gatwech. Although some stakeholders are apprehensive this could complicate the talks, mediators might consider facilitating parallel discussions with Gen. Thomas, while efforts to engage Gen. Simon Gatwech should be intensified to encourage his participation.
Confusion arose regarding the two-week timeline established during President Ruto’s November visit to Juba, but Gen. Lazarus Sumbeiywo clarified this expectation in his opening remarks. All parties were urged to reach a peace agreement quickly, which could serve as a much-needed Christmas gift for South Sudan’s people.
Divergent perspectives regarding the initialed protocols emerged during the discussions. While the RTGoNU expressed the need for adjustments to enhance effective implementation, the Opposition Groups rejected any renegotiation. It is crucial to approach these proposed changes cautiously to avoid complications similar to the Abyei Protocol renegotiations, which resulted in long-standing issues. The push for effective protocols must accommodate the common goal of establishing a peaceful South Sudan.
Despite the complexities, the outlines for resolving differences appear feasible with timely negotiations. Professor Pauline Riak’s remarks reminded all parties about the ongoing suffering of the South Sudanese, emphasizing that failure to achieve peace is unacceptable. The term “Tumaini,” meaning hope, represents a revolutionary opportunity to shift the status quo, suggesting potential for transformative change in South Sudan.
Though optimism abounds regarding the Tumaini Initiative, there remains concern that discussions could extend beyond the initial two-week window, particularly if renegotiation of the protocols occurs. Continuous dialogue aimed at achieving consensus is essential for a sustainable peace agreement.
In conclusion, the Tumaini Initiative reflects a critical step towards peace in South Sudan, marked by increased inclusivity and alignment with existing agreements. Key observations indicate a shift in the RTGoNU’s approach, a call for the participation of diverse stakeholders, and the urgent need to reach a timely agreement. There is hope for transformative change, but challenges regarding protocol negotiations may prolong the talks, necessitating commitment from all parties involved.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
