Iraq’s PMF faces significant political contention over the controversial Service and Retirement Law, with arguments surrounding leadership retirement and political motives. The proposed legislation aims to secure member benefits but is entangled in broader political negotiations. Analysts highlight the need for public advocacy to counteract potential exploitation and promote democratic integrity.
Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) are embroiled in political tension regarding the contentious PMF Service and Retirement Law, generating significant debate, particularly among Shiite factions. As some factions advocate for a comprehensive approach to legislative efforts, public pressure is encouraged to prevent political exploitation of the law.
Established in 2014 under a fatwa by Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the PMF has become a crucial component of Iraq’s security apparatus, with funding projected to rise from $2.16 billion in 2021 to $2.6 billion by 2025. Comprised of around 200,000 personnel from diverse religious and ethnic groups, the PMF is predominantly Shiite and plays a key role alongside the Iraqi army and Global Coalition forces.
The PMF Law, approved by parliament in 2016 despite Sunni MPs’ boycott, designates the PMF as a supporting entity within Iraq’s military structure. This law enforces military regulations on PMF activities and prohibits political engagement among its members. The current proposed legislation aims to grant PMF members job security, retirement benefits, and social safety measures but has yet to pass fully.
Debate within the Coordination Framework, an alliance of Shiite parties excluding the Sadrist Movement, focuses on the unapproved status of the PMF law and its implications for the retirement of Faleh Al-Fayyad, the PMF head. Supporters claim the law is essential to formalize PMF operations, while critics view it as a vehicle for sidelining existing leadership and weakening the organization.
A recent draft of the PMF Retirement and Service Law has received support from multiple political factions, including Sunni representatives. Concerns persist regarding the potential retirement of approximately 400 PMF leaders, prompting a three-year delay in implementation to facilitate leadership training and appointments. This aims to ensure smooth transitions and operational continuity within the PMF.
Political analysts express concern that certain provisions in the PMF Law could be utilized for electoral manipulation. Specifically, Article 32/Third could allow for political motivations behind personnel retirements, especially targeting members who do not align with electoral efforts. Observers urge lawmakers to remain vigilant against such exploitative practices.
Shiite factions are advocating for amendments to the PMF law to facilitate its approval while linking it to broader political agreements. Controversial proposals could be bundled with the PMF law, reminiscent of past legislative practices that grouped contentious laws, raising concerns about overriding democratic processes.
Amidst ongoing challenges, political analysts stress that substantial public pressure is essential for reforming the PMF law and breaking the cycle of political exploitation. A united civil society and public awareness are critical to redirect political agendas and compel leaders to act in the public interest. Emphasizing collective responsibility, the aim is to enhance citizen engagement in shaping governance and policy-making processes.
The article discusses the political intricacies surrounding Iraq’s PMF Service and Retirement Law, underscoring the challenges of legislative approval amid potential exploitation. The debate spans various political factions, with key concerns about retirement provisions and implications for PMF leadership. Analysts emphasize the necessity for public pressure and civil society involvement to promote genuine democratic processes and prevent manipulation of political laws.
Original Source: shafaq.com
