Sudan’s RSF and allied factions have established a parallel government, aiming to bring order to rebel-held regions amid ongoing conflict with the national army. The charter outlines goals for a secular state and unified army, but concerns arise over potential fragmentation of the country. International responses and allegations of support complicate the geopolitical landscape surrounding Sudan’s ongoing strife.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) of Sudan, along with allied groups, have established a parallel government, as announced on Sunday. This initiative aims to create a ‘government of peace and unity’ across rebel-held territories in the war-torn northeast African nation, despite international warnings about potential ramifications. The charter, signed in Nairobi, signals ongoing efforts to regain control amid escalating conflict with the national army, which has already displaced over 12 million citizens.
Signatories include members of the United Civil Forces and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N), led by Abdelaziz al-Hilu, who oversee portions of southern Sudan. The charter emphasizes the establishment of a secular, democratic, and decentralised state, promoting equality while addressing the need for a unified national army.
Although the charter suggests an intention to improve humanitarian access and unify armed factions, concerns about further destabilizing the region persist. The RSF’s involvement was highlighted in the context of recent losses and aims to shift their role from a militia to a recognized governmental authority. Criticism came from the Sudan army government, which rejected recognition of the new structure.
Experts point out that the RSF’s expected objectives include establishing an air force and enhancing aid efforts to bolster their negotiating power. However, the viability of this arrangement is questioned, given international embargoes against arms sales due to ongoing conflicts, notably those in Darfur.
Additionally, Kenya’s role in facilitating the charter signing faced backlash, leading to a diplomatic recall by Sudan’s army government. Allegations of external support for the RSF, particularly concerning arms supplies from the UAE, exacerbate the already complex situation permeating Sudan’s governance crisis and territorial disputes.
In summary, the formation of a parallel government by Sudan’s RSF and allies marks a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict, aiming to establish control in rebel-held areas. Despite promising to enhance governance and humanitarian conditions, the move raises substantial concerns regarding further national fragmentation and regional stability. The RSF’s strategic goals highlight their transition from a militia to a political authority, though prospects for broader acceptance remain dubious amidst existing international restrictions.
Original Source: www.france24.com
