Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces and allies are establishing a rival government, aiming for peace in affected regions despite fears of national fragmentation. Despite the presence of various factions at the signing in Nairobi, the Sudanese army has strongly opposed this move, citing concerns about further division. The ongoing conflict has led to significant humanitarian crises, with millions displaced and both sides accused of atrocities.
Sudan’s paramilitary group, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), and its allies have announced the establishment of a rival government amidst ongoing conflict in the country. This decision, shared by sources, suggests the charter aims to promote unity and peace in regions controlled by rebel factions, despite fears of further national fragmentation.
The charter provides a framework for a “government of peace and unity” in areas affected by the war, which has displaced over 12 million individuals. The signing event, conducted privately in Nairobi, involved key factions, including a segment of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N). Notably, RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Daglo did not attend the event.
Among the charter’s aspirations is the formation of a secular, democratic, and decentralized state emphasizing equality and justice. It proposes the creation of a unified national army that reflects Sudan’s diverse identity while integrating armed groups into a single force.
The formation of this government follows growing divisions within Taqadum, the leading civilian coalition, which has split into pro and anti-RSF factions. Alaa El-Din Nuqd, a signatory representing professional unions, highlighted that the proposed government aims to rectify service shortcomings in RSF-controlled areas, where residents struggle to access essential services.
As the conflict increases, the Sudanese army’s chief has announced intentions to create a “war cabinet” following military successes against the RSF. Kenya faced backlash from Sudan’s army-aligned government for hosting the charter signing, resulting in diplomatic tensions. UN and Arab League officials have cautioned that the new developments could exacerbate Sudan’s fragmentation.
Despite concerns of division, RSF representatives have articulated that their goal is not to split Sudan. The ongoing war, rooted in disputes over military integration and legitimacy, has resulted in significant casualties and widespread accusations of atrocities on both sides. Currently, the army controls the north and east, while RSF dominates the west and parts of the south.
The formation of a rival government by Sudan’s RSF and its allies represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict. While it seeks peace and unity in rebel-held territories, international warnings about potential fragmentation of the country raise concerns about the stability and humanitarian situation in Sudan. The internal division among Sudanese political factions further complicates the path to resolution.
Original Source: www.thehindu.com
