The article explores ethnic tensions in Mauritania, emphasizing the Fula-Tekrur groups’ claims for equality and identity within the political landscape. Despite historical representation, they feel marginalized and perceive Mauritania as an apartheid state. Calls for inclusive dialogue emphasize a need for constitutional changes to foster equal power and representation among all ethnic groups, particularly Fula, Soninke, and Wolof.
In the ongoing discussion about ethnicity in Mauritania, it raises a critical question regarding the recognition of equality among its diverse ethnic groups. Despite the significant representation of the Fula and Tekrur in various government roles prior to 1989, including military leadership and ambassadorships, they still perceive Mauritania as a site of apartheid. This sentiment highlights a deeper quest for identity among these groups, which will only be resolved with constitutional adjustments ensuring equal representation for all ethnicities.
The Fula-Tekrur military faction attempted to assert control through aggressive means and sought to garner support for invasions into other ethnically defined territories, illustrating their struggle for power. Their demands emphasize a need for equitable acknowledgment of identity in national governance. However, the current ruling Moors remain resistant to sharing power, fearing a dilution of their dominance with other ethnic competitors such as the Saharawi and Azawadi.
Calls for an inclusive national dialogue persist, centering on the transformative refoundation of Mauritania’s state identity. This would move beyond the current Arab-centric composition to encompass Fula, Soninke, Wolof, and potentially Harratine groups depending on their constitutional recognition. Discussions also include potential revisions to the official language status to incorporate non-Arabic languages.
The discourse surrounding governance often oscillates between parties and civil society, focused not solely on practical political issues but also on profound identity disputes. Such persistent claims reflect deeper irrational feelings tied to identity dissatisfaction, pointing to a need for comprehensive change in Mauritania’s ethnic policy to address these lasting grievances.
The examination of ethnic identity within Mauritania reveals deep-seated issues of representation, power dynamics, and the urgent need for reforms. The ongoing tension between the Fula-Tekrur groups and the ruling Moors illustrates a struggle for equal recognition and governance. Acknowledging these complexities through constitutional amendments may pave the way for lasting peace and inclusivity among the nation’s diverse ethnic groups.
Original Source: aqlame.com
