Zimbabwe experienced mixed reactions to a protest called by war veteran Blessed Geza against President Mnangagwa. Many citizens participated by staying away from work, indicating discontent, while the ruling party claimed the protests had little effect, highlighting differing perspectives within the country.
The protests initiated by Zimbabwean war veteran Blessed Geza have received various responses, reflecting divisions in public sentiment. On Monday, many Zimbabweans refrained from going to work, contributing to a noticeable calm in major cities, including the capital, Harare. The protests were aimed at opposing President Emmerson Mnangagwa, with Geza expressing gratitude for the turnout, stating that the empty streets demonstrated a desire for change.
Despite the protests, ZANU-PF spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa dismissed their significance, claiming they lacked impact. He asserted that the Zimbabwean populace demonstrated their political strength by rejecting a scenario that could hinder African progress, suggesting a more positive public engagement with governance than the protests implied.
The recent protests in Zimbabwe, called for by war veteran Blessed Geza, showcase a divided public response, with many citizens choosing to stay away from work as a form of dissent against President Emmerson Mnangagwa. However, the ruling party, via spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa, contends that the protests did not resonate significantly with the populace, indicating a complex political landscape in Zimbabwe.
Original Source: www.sabcnews.com
