The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu has sparked anger among Nigerians, with concerns over the legality of suspending elected officials. Critics argue this mirrors military rule in West Africa, undermining Nigeria’s democratic stature. The move has economic implications, threatening foreign investment and intensifying local tensions, particularly among marginalized Ijaw communities. Overall, the situation calls for a political resolution to avert deeper instability.
The tension in Nigeria is palpable, particularly in Rivers State after President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency, suspending Governor Sim Fubara and the state Assembly. This raises concerns regarding Nigeria’s commitment to democracy as critics fear it mirrors actions taken by military regimes in Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. Legal experts, including the Nigerian Bar Association, strongly oppose the suspension of elected officials, deeming it illegal and politically motivated.
Following the removal of Fubara, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas was appointed as the new administrator in a manner perceived as undemocratic. Many believe that resolving internal crises should involve political solutions rather than military interventions, warning that Nigeria’s stance may inadvertently support military rule in neighboring countries. This pattern is troubling, especially considering Nigeria’s prior condemnation of military coups in West Africa.
Countries like Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso have maintained that their military rulers are preferable to the previous civilian governments, which they claim served foreign interests over their own citizens’ welfare. This is evident in the financial exploitation of Niger’s uranium resources by foreign companies, which significantly diminished revenue for the Nigerien government.
ECOWAS, under Tinubu’s leadership, had issued threats of sanctions and insisted on restoring democratic governance in these countries, portraying military rule as outdated and adverse. Despite this, military governments in the region recently withdrew from ECOWAS, spurred by perceived injustices.
The state of emergency in Rivers could exacerbate political instability rather than resolve it, as many Nigerians express concern over the absence of effective governance during this period. Critics argue that the president’s unilateral action has deepened tensions between factions, particularly between political figures Wike and Fubara, suggesting a possible governmental overreach in state affairs.
The concerns extend to economic implications, as the turmoil in Rivers State jeopardizes foreign investments in Nigeria, which has struggled with low oil outputs and theft. Observers note that potential foreign investors could be deterred by the ongoing political crisis, leading to a failure in improving the economic landscape. The government must pivot towards fostering an environment conducive to investment, focusing on stability rather than political machinations.
Moreover, the marginalization felt by the Ijaw people in Rivers, coupled with recent Supreme Court rulings against the state’s fiscal allocations, adds to the populace’s discontent. The historical context of political upheaval indicates that missteps, such as the current emergency ruling, can ignite civil unrest reminiscent of past crises.
In light of these developments, stakeholders must prioritize peace and governance strategies that align with democratic principles and focus on economic stability. The overarching message remains clear: Nigeria must avert a return to the violent upheaval of past eras for the sake of its citizens and the health of its economy.
The suspension of democratic governance in Rivers State raises significant concerns about Nigeria’s commitment to democracy, drawing parallels with military regimes in neighboring countries. Legal experts and civil society warn of potential instability, emphasizing the need for political solutions over militaristic tactics. The situation also threatens foreign investment, crucial for Nigeria’s economic recovery, amidst fears of a resurgence of unrest. Overall, a re-evaluation of governance strategies focusing on stability and democratic practices is essential for Nigeria’s future.
Original Source: businessday.ng
