President Trump has set a two-month deadline for Iran to negotiate a new nuclear deal, indicating a preference for diplomatic solutions over military action. The communication was facilitated through the UAE, showing significant geopolitical maneuvers. Khamenei’s response reiterated Iran’s stance against negotiation pressures, framing them as attempts at domination.
President Donald Trump has proposed a two-month deadline for Iran to negotiate a new nuclear deal. This proposal was delivered to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei via the United Arab Emirates, with the intent to regulate Iran’s nuclear capabilities more stringently. Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, facilitated the communication during a recent visit to Abu Dhabi.
The National Security Council’s spokesman, Brian Hughes, emphasized that Trump seeks a diplomatic resolution to the nuclear dispute quickly, stating that failure to achieve this may lead to alternative measures. This aligns with previous discussions Trump had concerning the nuclear deal during a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, highlighting concerns about weapon proliferation in the Middle East.
In a recent interview, Trump expressed a preference for diplomacy over military action regarding Iran, stressing that a deal would benefit Iran. He acknowledged, however, that if negotiations fail, the U.S. might take stronger actions, hinting at military responses if necessary. During Trump’s first term, his administration withdrew from the earlier nuclear agreement and authorized a strike on Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani, escalating tensions with Tehran.
Returning to his “maximum pressure” strategy, Trump aims to isolate Iran economically and diplomatically. Ayatollah Khamenei, in response to recent calls for negotiations, accused “bully states” of using diplomacy to impose dominance rather than resolve conflicts.
President Trump’s two-month ultimatum to Iran emphasizes a desire for a diplomatic resolution regarding its nuclear program while maintaining the threat of military action if negotiations fail. Despite Iran’s leadership portraying such negotiations as coercive, the U.S. aims for tighter control over its nuclear capabilities and seeks to prevent potential conflicts in the Middle East.
Original Source: keyt.com
