Oleksandr Kraiev explains that Trump’s absence from Saudi Arabia talks stems from his desire to be linked only to victorious outcomes, preferring not to engage in negotiations that may lead to failure. He emphasizes the importance of preparation and tangible results in Trump’s approach to diplomacy, particularly regarding the war in Ukraine. The recent Saudi talks involved discussions of bilateral relations and the potential for concessions to Russia for peace.
International affairs expert Oleksandr Kraiev from the Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism” has analyzed former President Trump’s absence from recent negotiations in Saudi Arabia. He suggests that Trump prefers to associate only with successful outcomes and avoids situations where he might not achieve immediate results. Kraiev emphasizes that Trump’s political approach traditionally involves thorough preparation ahead of summits to ensure progress has been made on previously discussed matters.
From a psychological view, Trump’s strategy focuses on tangible successes; he dislikes being linked to unresolved or intermediate results. He conveys that if Trump makes a public statement, it necessitates a direct follow-through and achievements to cement a favorable narrative. Any meetings or negotiations must yield beneficial outcomes, as failure could detract from his desired image of a winner.
Kraiev further explains that Trump has been cautious about discussions regarding the war in Ukraine, recognizing the absence of swift solutions. His past experience with negotiations, such as with Kim Jong-un, showcases his frustration with prolonged discussions that yield no clear agreements. This has led him to sidestep complex engagements where quick resolutions are unlikely, fueling his preference to limit his political affiliations to successful efforts only.
In relation to the Saudi Arabian negotiations, delegations from Ukraine and the United States convened on March 11. This event marked a significant meeting following recent tensions at the White House. According to spokesperson Heorhiy Tykhyi, the agenda covered bilateral relations, strategic partnerships, and pathways to peace. Reports suggest that the U.S. aimed to evaluate Ukraine’s readiness for material concessions to Russia in exchange for an end to the conflict.
Kraiev’s analysis sheds light on Trump’s strategic avoidance of situations that may lead to unsuccessful negotiations, particularly concerning the ongoing war in Ukraine. His preference for aligning himself with victorious outcomes influences his participation in diplomatic talks, evident in his absence from the crucial discussions in Saudi Arabia. The evolving negotiations between Ukrainian and American representatives highlight ongoing efforts to assess and engage in the peace process amid complex geopolitical tensions.
Original Source: global.espreso.tv
