Residents of Goma are frustrated by the M23 rebel group’s boycott of Angola-led peace talks, viewing it as a misguided reaction to European sanctions. This withdrawal heightens local despair for resolution. Civil society advocates are calling for inclusion in discussions, emphasizing that the security crisis in the region is complex and extends beyond M23’s actions. The Congolese government has arrived to negotiate, while Angola awaits a response from the M23.
Residents of Goma have expressed frustration following the M23 group’s decision to boycott peace talks led by Angola. This decision, perceived as an overreaction to European sanctions, has deepened the sense of hopelessness among locals who had anticipated improvement from these negotiations. Many feel that missing this opportunity further hinders their chances for relief and peace after experiencing turmoil since the group’s takeover of Goma last month.
The M23 rebels announced their boycott to protest European sanctions imposed on several of their members. They claimed this decision severely undermined ongoing peace efforts, complicating dialogues essential for progress. Lawrence Kanyuka, the spokesperson for M23, emphasized the detrimental impact of sanctions on the negotiations.
Local citizens voiced their disappointment, stating that the M23’s boycott is an unjustifiable abandonment of the negotiation process. They urged organizers to ensure the rebels return to the table, arguing that the sanctions should not excuse their failure to engage in talks aimed at resolving the conflict with the Congolese state.
Civil society organizations in eastern DRC are advocating for direct negotiations involving both M23 and the government. Danny Singoma, representing an umbrella group of around 50 organizations, asserted that the region’s security issues are vast and multifaceted, extending beyond the M23 conflict. This perspective highlights that regions like Ituri and Grand Katanga also suffer from severe crises that require attention.
The report suggests a broad coalition of social and political actors should engage in discussions about the Congo’s future rather than allow the M23 and the government to dictate terms alone. As for the negotiations in Luanda, the Congolese government has arrived to participate, while Angola awaits to respond to the M23’s refusal to engage.
The frustration among Goma residents underscores the urgent need for dialogue as the M23’s withdrawal from peace talks complicates hopes for resolution. Many locals see the boycott, driven by sanctions, as an overreaction, urging for renewed negotiations. Furthermore, involvement from civil society could provide a more comprehensive approach to the overlapping crises in the region as various local leaders push for broader engagement beyond the M23. The situation remains tense as the Congolese government engages in negotiations mediated by Angola.
Original Source: eastleighvoice.co.ke
