U.S. military officials assert the need for options to secure access to the strategically vital Panama Canal. Trump seeks to “take back” control, citing China’s influence on the waterway. A recent interim national security document calls for military planning, while the U.S. remains treaty-bound to protect the canal’s neutrality after its 1999 handover to Panama.
U.S. officials have indicated that the military must prepare options to ensure full access to the Panama Canal, a strategically critical waterway. President Trump has voiced intentions to “take back” control of the canal but has not detailed the methods or military actions that may be necessary. An official mentioned that a recent interim national security guidance urges the military to explore options for safeguarding access to the canal.
The Pentagon’s last comprehensive National Defense Strategy (NDS) was issued in 2022, outlining military priorities. In contrast, interim guidance provides broad policy direction, similar to Trump’s prior executive orders and public comments, preceding a more thorough NDS. The Pentagon has yet to comment on the current directives regarding the Canal.
Trump claims U.S. interests are threatened as China exerts influence over the canal, suggesting it could undermine American strategic advantages. During his inaugural address, Trump reiterated that Panama has violated commitments made during the canal’s transfer in 1999. Any hostile takeover by a foreign entity is likely to breach international law.
Legally, both the U.S. and Panama are committed to defending the canal’s neutrality, allowing unilateral actions if necessary. The U.S. initially gained rights to the canal construction and operation in the early 20th century, ultimately ceding control to Panama as per a 1979 treaty signed by President Jimmy Carter at the end of 1999.
In conclusion, Trump has called for the U.S. military to prepare options for ensuring access to the Panama Canal amid concerns over China’s control. While the specifics of his plans remain unclear, the U.S. holds treaty obligations to protect the canal’s neutrality. The ongoing discussion reflects ongoing tensions regarding global strategic waterways and the balance of international power.
Original Source: www.kibrispostasi.com
