PCCA criticizes IGAD’s recent report on South Sudan, claiming it misrepresents the effectiveness of the R-ARCSS. They emphasize ongoing violence and violations by political leaders as evidence of the agreement’s failure. The Coalition advocates for an inclusive political dialogue, calling for leadership changes to facilitate a genuine peace process. They warn against the risks of continued political instability, urging IGAD to realign its approach to the pressing issues South Sudan faces.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) has expressed strong discontent regarding the IGAD’s latest report and communiqué concerning South Sudan’s peace process. The PCCA specifically criticizes the assertion that the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) is fundamental to peace, calling these claims misleading and harmful to genuine progress toward stability.
The coalition argues that, contrary to IGAD’s claims, the R-ARCSS has not been effectively implemented, as evidenced by President Kiir’s violations and the ongoing military defections within the country. They emphasize that the enduring unrest and humanitarian crises demonstrate a failure of the agreement to restore peace, stating that it has instead led to increased suffering for the ordinary South Sudanese populace.
PCCA highlights that the recent violence in Nasir, while notable, is just symptomatic of broader discontent with the R-ARCSS. The group asserts that the focus on high-profile political elites is part of why IGAD is only now taking notice. They further question the validity of IGAD’s claim that the agreement has allowed for long-term developmental investments due to the continuing conflicts and economic struggles.
The statement underscores the vague nature of IGAD’s proposed solutions, including the establishment of a Ministerial-level sub-committee on South Sudan. PCCA critiques this approach as inadequate, noting that sustainable peace requires addressing fundamental causes of instability—a task they feel is overlooked in the summit’s resolutions.
Furthermore, PCCA posits that the narrative surrounding the R-ARCSS fails to mirror the actual challenges faced in South Sudan, particularly in the context of succession politics and the potential power transition within the ruling party. They believe focusing solely on the R-ARCSS limits a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying issues.
The Coalition insists that both President Kiir and Dr. Riek Machar must relinquish their political roles to enable an inclusive dialogue aimed at drafting a constitution and organizing elections. They warn that without significant reforms and a fresh political approach, South Sudan risks destabilization, which may have regional implications.
In conclusion, the PCCA calls for urgent action from IGAD to redirect its strategies toward more pertinent issues, advocating for a national dialogue facilitating peaceful political transitions. They affirm that the process of peace should involve dismantling private militias and prioritizing a constitutional agreement that aligns with the demands of the South Sudanese people.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action strongly criticizes IGAD for failing to address the real issues plaguing South Sudan, particularly regarding the effectiveness and relevance of the R-ARCSS. They argue for a shift in focus towards genuine solutions for lasting peace, including political transitions and national dialogue, to avoid further destabilization in the region.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
