The Guyana government faces backlash over the use of the “One Guyana” slogan in passports, perceived as a political move undermining democracy. Opposition MP Walton-Desir criticized this as a step toward authoritarianism and a violation of ICAO guidelines. Other instances of state resources used for political branding were also highlighted, emphasizing the need for public accountability and international observation.
The Government of Guyana faces criticism for using the “One Guyana” political slogan in the new passport. Opposition MP Amanza Walton-Desir expressed concern, claiming this move indicates a shift toward a one-party dictatorship. She argues that the passport, a sovereign document, should remain neutral, representing all citizens rather than a political party.
Walton-Desir emphasized that embedding political slogans on passports undermines democratic norms and institutional integrity. She pointed out this practice could violate international guidelines from the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), which mandates neutrality in passport design and prohibits partisan messaging.
This situation is not an isolated case, as Walton-Desir noted other instances of state resources being used for political branding, such as law enforcement officers’ uniforms and public servants’ clothing. She warned that such actions blur the lines between the government and the ruling party, marking a regression in democracy.
Walton-Desir urged citizens and the international community to take notice of the situation and resist this trend. She recalled that the PPP once criticized the previous government for using party colors on government buildings but has now engaged in similar practices since taking office. The phrase “One Guyana” has been increasingly used at official events and is appearing on national signage in several communities.
The incorporation of the “One Guyana” slogan into official documents like passports raises significant concerns about political neutrality and democratic integrity in Guyana. Criticism from the opposition underscores the potential for authoritarianism when state resources are used for political branding, challenging the distinction between state and party. This situation demands attention from both citizens and international observers to safeguard democratic principles.
Original Source: newssourcegy.com
