M23 militia, backed by Rwanda, captures key DRC cities Goma and Bukavu, aiming to revise the geopolitical map of the Great Lakes region. The resurgence of M23 stems from unmet government promises and Rwanda’s security concerns, leading to humanitarian crises. Regional tensions rise as Burundi and Uganda react, with Tshisekedi’s government losing control. U.S. pressure is critical yet has faced limitations, risking broader conflict.
In January and February, the M23 militia captured Goma and Bukavu, critical cities in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), expanding their control over a territory comparable to Connecticut. The Rwandan-backed rebel group is not only consolidating military power but also establishing local administrations, indicating a strategic effort to reshape the geopolitical landscape of Africa’s Great Lakes region.
Originally emerging in 2012, M23 was defeated in 2013 amid international pressure on Rwanda. Although it claims to protect the Rwandophone community in eastern Congo, primarily the Tutsi population, its agenda aligns closely with Rwanda’s interests, including the recent establishment of the Alliance du Fleuve Congo (AFC), which seeks regime change in Kinshasa. The resurgence of M23 in November 2021 was fueled by Rwanda’s concerns over its regional interests amidst the Congolese government’s unfulfilled commitments to militia veterans.
Rwanda sees multiple interests in eastern DRC, viewing the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) as a significant security threat and recognizing the economic value of gold sourced from the region. With neighboring countries expanding military operations in areas it considers its influence, Rwanda has strengthened M23 as a proxy to secure its interests. Reports indicate 4,000 to 7,000 Rwandan troops are currently in DRC, supporting M23.
The offensive by M23 has led to a severe humanitarian crisis, displacing over three million people and resulting in widespread deaths. Public health conditions are deteriorating, and the potential for a broader regional conflict is increasing. Neighboring Burundi is particularly concerned, with rising tensions leading to accusations of cross-border support for rebel groups. Burundian President Évariste Ndayishimiye has called for military preparedness against Rwanda, further escalating the situation.
Uganda shares geopolitical interests in the DRC, including significant economic ties through gold exports. While the Ugandan army has reportedly supported M23, it has also increased its own military presence in the region. This dual approach reflects ongoing tensions and competition with Rwanda for influence in eastern DRC.
President Felix Tshisekedi’s authority is waning as M23 expands its control. The withdrawal of Burundian forces has shattered DRC’s military strategy. Many in Katanga, an industrial center, have grown disillusioned with Tshisekedi’s government and may look favorably upon M23 despite not fully endorsing them. This increasing discontent and internal political tension heighten the risk of conflict reminiscent of the Second Congolese war.
Pressure from the U.S. has historically played a crucial role in curbing support for M23. Isolated, Tshisekedi is attempting to rejuvenate international pressure on Rwanda, but success has been limited. Efforts have included military assistance proposals linked to access to DRC’s mineral wealth, though these offers have been criticized as unstructured and impractical by U.S. officials.
Under President Biden, the U.S. has denounced Rwanda’s backing of M23, implementing sanctions against key individuals. However, no significant development aid was suspended, indicating a lack of robust response. U.S. sanctions on Rwandan officials related to M23 represent a cautious step forward, but more substantial pressure will be necessary to compel Kigali to withdraw support for the militia.
With Kinshasa’s control rapidly diminishing, M23 establishing a foothold in the east, and the potential for a larger conflict looming, the urgency for effective international intervention is critical.
The article highlights the geopolitical tensions involving M23, Rwanda, and neighboring countries as they navigate complex territorial ambitions in eastern DRC. With a humanitarian crisis unfolding and internal divisions exacerbating conflict risks, urgent international pressure is necessary to address and potentially stabilize the region. U.S. involvement, despite challenges, remains pivotal in reshaping the situation.
Original Source: responsiblestatecraft.org