Sudan has accused the UAE of complicity in genocide due to its alleged support for the RSF in a civil war. The UAE’s interests include resource investment and regional influence, especially amid Saudi rivalry. Although facing accusations, UAE denies involvement and claims Sudan’s legal action is a publicity stunt, yet the situation may affect its reputation internationally.
Sudan has accused the United Arab Emirates (UAE) of complicity in genocide, highlighting its alleged involvement in the ongoing civil war at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The UAE has faced accusations from Sudan and other nations for supporting the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a group in conflict with Sudan’s regular army for nearly two years, which the UAE denies.
Sudan’s significance to the UAE stems from its vast natural resources, including agricultural land, gas, and gold. Sudan is Africa’s third-largest gold producer and is strategically located by the Red Sea—a vital route for oil shipping. UAE’s interest includes investment opportunities in resources and trade due to the country’s position in the region.
The UAE’s relationship with Sudan intensified following Sudan’s military coup in 2021, led by generals Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, known as Hemeti. Recent conflicts between these leaders have drawn support from various international powers, including the UAE, which has sought to increase political influence in Sudan.
Furthermore, the UAE’s involvement in the region is influenced by a broader strategy to counter Saudi Arabia’s influence and the political dynamics surrounding the Muslim Brotherhood, which both the UAE and RSF oppose. Despite denying support, the UAE’s alleged backing of Daglo is seen as an effort to challenge Saudi objectives in Sudan.
Speculation has arisen regarding the UAE’s involvement with the RSF, particularly following their cooperation in Yemen since 2015. With rising tensions between the UAE and Saudi Arabia, analysts suggest that the UAE’s ties with Daglo are both strategic and ideological, amidst accusations of human rights violations against the RSF, including genocide against ethnic groups.
Sudan’s case at the ICJ seeks to hold the UAE accountable for its alleged wartime support. The UAE has dismissed this as a “publicity stunt,” seeking to retract the case while emphasizing its legal obligations. Although ICJ rulings are binding, enforcement remains limited, and experts note that while this may hurt the UAE’s reputation, its substantial influence is likely to mitigate serious consequences.
The UAE’s involvement in Sudan highlights its strategic interests in a resource-rich country, amid accusations of supporting the RSF during a civil war. While the Sudanese government seeks accountability at the ICJ, the UAE’s response indicates a potential minimization of repercussions due to its significant political and financial influence. Nonetheless, the international perception of the UAE as a destabilizer remains a concern that could impact its global standing.
Original Source: www.ndtv.com
