Intense Israeli strikes in South Lebanon have escalated following the withdrawal deadline, with significant military actions targeting Hezbollah. In response, Hezbollah has redirected accountability to the Lebanese state, emphasizing its avoidance of criticism amid ongoing conflict. Political discussions continue regarding the government’s role and U.S. involvement in regional tensions.
In recent days, South Lebanon has faced significant Israeli military actions following the expiration of the February 18 withdrawal deadline. An airstrike targeting a vehicle resulted in one death and one injury, marking the most intense strikes in the region. Israeli military spokesperson Avichay Adraee reported that a drone strike aimed at a Hezbollah operative involved in reconstructing “terrorist infrastructure” in southern Lebanon. Israel has committed to ongoing operations to neutralize threats from Hezbollah.
Israeli warplanes carried out extensive operations over areas like Nabatieh and Iqlim al-Tuffah, conducting over 20 airstrikes on southern towns, such as Mount Rihan and Sidon on Friday night. The Israeli military confirmed targeting Hezbollah military sites, citing the presence of weapons storage and rocket launch facilities that threaten Israeli security.
Despite the escalating military actions, Hezbollah has declared a stance of “military silence,” deflecting responsibility to the Lebanese government. This position was articulated by MP Hussein Hajj Hassan, who emphasized the government’s duty to respond to public concerns around the ongoing occupation and regional dynamics.
Riad Kahwaji, head of INEGMA, interprets these developments as Hezbollah’s strategy to shift blame away from itself, seeking to avoid backlash from its supporters for miscalculations that have led to conflict and devastation in Lebanon. He posits that Hezbollah may later argue for the necessity of retaining its military capabilities and seeking Iranian financial support for reconstruction, which is currently limited.
During a ceremony honoring a fallen fighter, MP Hussein Hajj Hassan raised essential questions regarding the government’s stance on the occupation and how it plans to respond to perceived U.S. complicity in the Israeli actions. He criticized the U.S. role in overseeing ceasefire efforts while supporting Israeli aggression, urging the Lebanese government to provide clear answers to the concerns of its citizens and families of affected individuals.
The recent intensification of Israeli military actions in South Lebanon highlights a precarious security situation. Hezbollah’s shift of responsibility to the Lebanese state reflects its strategic attempt to evade internal criticism and maintain its influence. The calls from political figures for government accountability underscore the need for a cohesive national response to the ongoing occupation and external pressures.
Original Source: english.aawsat.com
