The U.S. continues military efforts in Syria targeting Al-Qaeda and ISIS despite regime change. Recent strikes have involved significant air operations against extremist groups, as well as broader Pentagon policies that may clear the way for increased military action. Concerns about the justification for U.S. presence remain critical amidst unclear military objectives.
The U.S. continues military operations in Syria amid ongoing instability, recently targeting Al-Qaeda affiliates in Idlib. U.S. Central Command confirmed strikes that included the killing of Wasim Tahsin Bayraqdar, linked to a Syrian government official, and another individual from the extremist group Hurras al-Din, bringing the total number of strikes against this group to four since it announced a cessation of operations in January.
U.S. military actions have included over 75 strikes against ISIS, targeting key leaders and operations associated with both ISIS and Iranian-backed militias bordering Iraq. Utilizing a range of aircraft, including F-15s and B-52s, these missions continue unabated even after the fall of Assad’s regime.
Adam Weinstein from the Quincy Institute highlighted concerns regarding the U.S. reliance on air strikes rather than diplomatic engagement in Syria. He noted that Assad’s new regime may tolerate these attacks as they eliminate potential rivals. With many Islamist factions dissolving under the new leadership, Washington’s justification for military operations is increasingly less clear.
The Biden administration asserted its military presence in Syria, citing the need to prevent ISIS from exploiting the power vacuum created by Assad’s overthrow, without explicitly addressing Al-Qaeda remnants as part of the target list.
Former President Trump has expressed a desire to reduce U.S. military involvement in Syria; however, continuing air strikes remain a possibility even if troop withdrawals occur, as these operations are launched from bases in the region. Recent policy changes by the Pentagon suggest a broader range of targets for air strikes, which raises concerns about international law and civilian safety.
The ongoing conflict presents a complex scenario for U.S. forces, with the Trump administration yet to outline a clear strategy for Syria. As military actions persist, questions of justification and the mission’s clarity linger, prompting experts to express unease about troop placements in uncertain circumstances.
The U.S. remains entangled in military operations in Syria despite regime changes and the fall of Assad. Ongoing air strikes against Al-Qaeda affiliates and ISIS highlight the complexity of intervention without a clear mission. Without clear justification for troop and air strike continuance, concerns regarding international legality and stability intensify. The situation in Syria necessitates careful scrutiny as military strategies evolve amid shifting political landscapes.
Original Source: responsiblestatecraft.org
