Kamchybek Tashiev has criticized the 12-year education system proposal in Kyrgyzstan, citing declining education quality and significant infrastructural needs. He pointed out that only a small percentage of students enroll in foreign universities. He raised concerns about the financial burden and the potential for corruption in higher education, warning rectors of forthcoming inspections.
Kamchybek Tashiev, Deputy Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers and Chairman of the State National Security Committee in Kyrgyzstan, has criticized the initiative to transition the country to a 12-year education system. He believes that the current quality of education has deteriorated and that it is premature to implement such a significant change without addressing existing challenges in the educational framework.
Tashiev pointed out that proponents of this reform argue it would facilitate admission to foreign universities. However, he noted that only 3-5% of applicants successfully enroll in institutions in Europe and America, while the majority pursue education in universities located in the CIS countries and Kyrgyzstan.
He has expressed concern over potential economic repercussions, estimating a need for over 30,000 additional teachers and around 200 new schools to accommodate the transition. He warned that the quality of higher education is at risk, becoming a vehicle for corruption and exploitation in some cases.
Additionally, Tashiev highlighted the growing trend of individuals acquiring diplomas without genuinely enrolling in universities or attending classes, a phenomenon noticeable in various educational institutions across the country. He has also cautioned university rectors regarding impending inspections to tackle corruption prevalent within higher education.
In summary, Kamchybek Tashiev has firmly opposed the shift to a 12-year education system in Kyrgyzstan due to concerns over declining education quality, financial implications, and the potential for increased corruption. He emphasizes that without significant reforms to address existing issues in the current educational landscape, such a transition would be unwise.
Original Source: akipress.com
