Liberman proposes that Egypt should absorb the majority of Gaza’s population into Sinai, given its vast size and shared cultural ties. He argues that this plan, encouraging voluntary relocation, could improve economic conditions for both regions. The relationship between Egypt, Israel, and the U.S. needs reassessment to address Gaza’s challenges effectively.
The Gaza Strip houses approximately 2.2 million people within a 360 square km area, translating into an extremely high population density and limited employment opportunities. In contrast, Sinai, with an area of 60,000 square km and a population of around 600,000, offers significantly more space and resources yet remains underutilized. This substantial difference in population density indicates that Gaza is about 600 times denser than Sinai.
Ethnically and culturally, the populations of Gaza and Sinai share strong similarities, including language, religion, and familial ties, especially notable in Rafah, which borders both regions. The existing connections highlight the compatibility and potential for integration. Currently, Sinai faces issues with illicit activities such as drug and weapon smuggling, but it also holds untapped agricultural and energy potential.
Transforming El-Arish into Gaza’s main port instead could enhance economic opportunities for both Gazans and Egyptians. A relocation initiative could see around one million Gazans move to Sinai under President Trump’s plan, promoting economic growth and improving livelihoods. This requires Egypt to ensure free movement for those wishing to relocate.
Critics of voluntary relocation argue against its morality, yet the acceptance of refugees from other conflicts indicates a double standard. If Egypt were to open the Rafah border, it is estimated that about 80 percent of Gazans would opt to leave willingly. Egypt’s role as a mediator is complicated by its increasing dependence on U.S. and Israeli support, especially given its human rights record and regional security needs.
The relationship between Egypt and Israel should be reassessed to address Gaza’s humanitarian crisis. It appears Egypt benefits from maintaining the situation in Gaza, as it secures its position as a mediator while capitalizing on smuggling activities across the border. Egypt’s military presence in Sinai exceeds previous agreements, and much of its military preparedness targets Israel as a potential adversary.
A recalibration of U.S. and Israeli strategies towards Egypt could stimulate genuine progress in resolving Gaza’s issues. Egypt’s historical administrative role over Gaza, prior to 1967, suggests a renewed leadership model under an Arab League aegis could provide necessary support. Responsible management in Gaza could ultimately lead to tangible benefits in terms of security, employment, and regional stability.
Trump’s relocation initiative represents a pivotal opportunity to address longstanding regional challenges through thoughtful planning and collaboration. The involvement of the U.S. and Israel is critical to persuade Egypt to adopt a proactive engagement strategy for Gaza’s future. This effort must tackle conventional opposition to find pragmatic solutions.
Egypt can play a crucial role in addressing the Gaza crisis by absorbing a significant portion of its population into Sinai, which offers ample space and resources. By facilitating voluntary migration and utilizing the untapped potential of Sinai, both Gaza and Egypt could benefit economically. A cooperative approach involving the U.S. and Israel could lead to a sustainable resolution while promoting stability in the region.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
