Jordanian media has underreported Syrian President Sharaa’s visit to Amman, where King Abdullah expressed opposition to Israeli airstrikes in Syria. The visit’s underlying significance includes discussions on southern Syria’s Israeli occupation and HTS’s presence. Jordan’s potential military involvement in southern Syria, particularly in support of Druze communities, is critical for regional security and countering Israeli narratives.
Jordanian state media has downplayed Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s recent Amman visit. Following the visit, King Abdullah condemned Israeli airstrikes in Syria, affirming support for Syria’s territorial integrity and advocating for the return of Syrian refugees. Key discussions on Israel’s occupation in southern Syria were notably absent from Jordanian media coverage, despite their potential relevance to Sharaa’s visit. Sharaa’s trip was likely influenced by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s position against the presence of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in southern Syria.
Israeli officials have indicated plans to guarantee rights for the Druze and Alawite populations, reflecting a concerning Israeli strategy that may lead to the further fragmentation of Syria into sectarian entities. This context emphasizes the need for Jordan to assert itself regarding southern Syrian dynamics, especially in relation to the contested areas influenced by HTS. Recent diplomatic engagements between Jordan and Turkey hint at discussions on southern Syria’s future.
Jordan’s Crown Prince Hussein met with Turkey’s President Erdogan prior to Sharaa’s visit, suggesting that Turkey encouraged collaboration regarding the stability of southern Syria. Key regions like Sweida and the native Druze population are likely priorities in this arrangement. A significant question remains about Jordan’s willingness to fulfill an active role, especially regarding security measures requested by HTS, which could include supporting Druze or maintaining control in Daraa.
Such a military presence could counter Israel’s narrative of a threat from HTS and bolster Syria’s territorial integrity. Historically, Jordan has been cautious about intervening militarily; however, the current landscape necessitates a reassessment of Jordan’s strategic role in Syria as vital for national security. Additionally, preserving access to essential water resources from the Yarmouk basin and the Unity Dam relies on regional stability.
Jordan’s relationships with southern Syrian communities can be leveraged to address Israeli ambitions. Although Jordan has traditionally maintained a non-interventionist stance, collaboration with Damascus, Turkey, and other regional allies may legitimize involvement in Syria. Timely discussions are crucial; if King Abdullah did not explore Jordan’s role during Sharaa’s visit, swift dialogues should ensue to counter Israeli narratives linking HTS with extremist groups.
Jordan’s inaction might exacerbate problems for both Syria and its own national security. It’s essential to understand the broader implications of Jordan’s diplomatic and security policies in light of shifting regional dynamics, particularly in response to Israel’s strategies in southern Syria.
In summary, Jordan faces significant geopolitical challenges concerning Israeli actions in southern Syria. Strengthening relations with Damascus and adjusting its security role may ultimately benefit Jordan’s national interests and regional stability. The evolving situation necessitates proactive engagement and clearly defined security strategies to counter Israeli expansionism and support affected communities.
Original Source: www.middleeasteye.net
