Jordan’s limited media coverage of Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s visit highlights issues surrounding Israeli expansion in southern Syria. King Abdullah condemned Israeli air strikes and supported Syrian territorial integrity. The visit raises questions about Jordan’s willingness to engage actively in southern Syria to counter Israel’s agenda and support local communities while securing its national interests.
Jordanian emphasis on Syria’s situation, especially concerning President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s recent visit to Amman, received limited media coverage. King Abdullah condemned Israeli air strikes in Syria and reaffirmed Jordan’s support for Syrian territorial integrity while advocating for Syrian refugees’ return. However, significant matters regarding Israel’s occupation of southern Syria and political dynamics were not highlighted, despite being the visit’s likely focus.
The context surrounding Sharaa’s visit was influenced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s statements about not allowing Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) to establish a foothold in southern Syria. Other Israeli officials have indicated an agenda that includes protecting Druze and Alawite communities, hinting at possible sectarian divisions in Syria’s future, a scenario favored by elements within the Israeli right.
Amid this delicate situation, Jordanian diplomatic sources noted previous discussions regarding southern Syria, particularly after the fall of Assad. Crown Prince Hussein’s meeting with Turkish President Erdogan likely encouraged Sharaa to coordinate with Jordan on southern Syria, particularly concerning the Druze community and Israel’s strategic motivations in the region.
This development presents a pivotal question about Jordan’s readiness to engage actively in southern Syria, especially if HTS approaches for support. Such involvement could entail influencing local communities, maintaining stability in Daraa, or even establishing a military presence along the border, countering Israeli assertions of security threats from HTS and other groups.
Despite a history of avoiding military roles in Syria, Jordan’s engagement could protect its strategic interests and national security. This includes ensuring Syria’s territorial integrity and facilitating the return of refugees, while also securing vital water resources from the Yarmouk basin.
Jordan maintains strong relationships with various communities in southern Syria, notably the Druze, which can be instrumental in coordinating efforts to oppose Israeli expansion. While Jordan traditionally hesitates to deploy forces abroad, potential collaboration with Damascus, supported by Turkey and regional stakeholders, could legitimize its involvement.
Timeliness is crucial. If discussions between King Abdullah and Sharaa did not cover Jordan’s role in southern Syria, such negotiations must be prioritized to counter the narrative promoted by the Israeli right regarding HTS. Inaction or delayed response from Jordan could lead to severe implications not only for Syria but also for its own national security.
The article underscores the critical need for Jordan to play a proactive role in Syria, especially regarding Israeli expansion in the south. Jordan’s historical connections and potential for influence with local communities can be pivotal in stabilizing the region. Addressing this issue promptly is essential for both Jordan’s national security and the broader geopolitical landscape.
Original Source: www.middleeasteye.net
