The RSF’s attempt to establish a parallel government in Sudan has caused significant concern over the country’s division. The initiative follows nearly two years of conflict, leading to widespread casualties and displacement. International responses have condemned this move, highlighting potential security, economic, and political ramifications.
Recent efforts by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) to establish a “parallel government” in Sudan have raised significant concerns both domestically and internationally, reflecting fears of increased division within the war-torn nation. On February 22, the RSF and allied groups signed a “political charter” in Kenya, declaring their intent to create this alternative governance structure; however, the Sudanese government quickly called the charter “stillborn.”
This initiative emerges from nearly two years of conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), which has led to over 29,600 deaths and displaced more than 15 million people, according to monitoring groups. Political analyst Abdul-Raziq Ziyada remarked that the stalemate in political settlements has given rise to such parallel governance attempts.
Khalid Dirar, a professor of political science, noted that this development indicates a shift in the power dynamic and the apparent fragmentation of Sudan. He cautioned that the RSF’s actions should be viewed seriously, as they could alter the prevailing balance of power.
Further, military expert Ahmed Ismail highlighted that the RSF’s expansion beyond Darfur suggests they may consolidate power in new regions. Political analyst Abdul-Rahman Awad warned of the adverse implications that a parallel government would have on Sudan’s already dire political and economic situation.
Abdul-Khaliq Mahjoub pointed out that the RSF may face obstacles in establishing governance, especially if the SAF gains ground in military engagements. This could limit the RSF’s ability to secure geographical areas conducive to governance.
On the international stage, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep concerns regarding the RSF’s charter, stating it worsens fragmentation within Sudan and poses risks to peace. He emphasized the necessity of maintaining Sudan’s unity and sovereignty for long-term stability.
Saudi Arabia, which has been mediating between the warring factions since May 2023, reiterated its rejection of the RSF’s proposed governance structure, stating any moves outside Sudan’s official institutions do not reflect the people’s will.
Additionally, the signing of the charter in Nairobi has escalated tensions with Kenya, with Sudan’s Foreign Ministry protesting the hosting of rebel militia meetings. Sudan has threatened to impose economic sanctions against Kenya, reflecting its dissatisfaction with the latter’s actions regarding the RSF.
The recent initiatives by the RSF to form a parallel government in Sudan underline the increasing fragmentation of the country amid ongoing conflict. Despite domestic and international pushback against these efforts, the situation remains precarious as the SAF and RSF continue to vie for control. The potential impacts on governance, security, and the economy could be profound, further complicating an already dire humanitarian crisis.
Original Source: english.news.cn
