Costa Rica abstained from a UN vote condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, altering its initial co-sponsorship of the resolution. The resolution received significant support, emphasizing Ukraine’s territorial integrity and calling for a halt to hostilities. Criticism ensued from former leaders regarding this shift in policy, leaving the reasons for abstention unclear.
Costa Rica opted to abstain from a United Nations vote that condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This decision was made during a recent UN assembly where representatives chose not to vote on a resolution denouncing Russia’s actions as a ‘full-scale invasion.’ The resolution received overwhelming support, with 93 votes in favor and called for the cessation of hostilities and the withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukraine.
The resolution emphasized the importance of Ukraine’s territorial integrity and called for renewed diplomatic efforts to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict that has persisted for three years. Notably, Costa Rica altered its position at the last minute, having initially co-sponsored the resolution. The lack of explanation for this decision has raised concerns among Costa Rican officials and the media.
Ambassador Maritza Chan did not provide details regarding Costa Rica’s abstention, despite inquiries from local press. Former President Laura Chinchilla expressed strong disapproval, stating that the decision undermines essential principles of Costa Rica’s foreign policy and threatens diplomatic balance. Additionally, former President Miguel Angel Rodriguez echoed this sentiment, describing the abstention as a betrayal of national interests regarding non-aggression and respect for sovereignty.
Costa Rica’s abstention from condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine during the UN assembly has sparked criticism from former leaders and raised questions about its foreign policy priorities. The resolution, which Costa Rica initially supported, emphasizes the need for territorial integrity and a peaceful resolution, highlighting the disconnect between its prior commitment and subsequent inaction. The absence of a clear rationale for this decision has further fueled discontent among the political community.
Original Source: ticotimes.net
