The RSF of Sudan has signed a charter to create a parallel government aimed at establishing a secular democracy and ending ongoing civil conflict. However, the initiative faces criticism from Sudan’s leadership and concerns from international observers about potential exacerbation of tensions and further fragmentation of the nation. Recent attacks by the RSF have resulted in significant civilian casualties, highlighting the precarious situation in Sudan.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group in Sudan, signed a charter with various political and armed entities in Nairobi, Kenya, establishing a “government of peace and unity.” This agreement, known as the New Founding Sudan Charter, aims to create a parallel government focused on establishing a secular democracy and ending the ongoing civil war, which has escalated since 2023.
Despite the charter’s stated goals of fostering peace, concerns have arisen that it could deepen existing divisions within Sudan and exacerbate the civil conflicts. United Nations spokesperson Stephane Dujjaric highlighted these fears, warning that the initiative may lead to further fragmentation and crisis. He emphasized that UN support is rooted in preserving Sudan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Sudan’s foreign affairs minister, Ali Youssef, voiced strong opposition to the newly formed charter, claiming that no entity could be recognized if it functions parallel to the established government. His remarks underscore the challenges of legitimizing such a government amid ongoing hostilities.
The RSF has been implicated in numerous violent acts against civilians since the onset of the civil wars. Recent reports indicate that attacks in the White Nile region have resulted in approximately 200 civilian deaths, raising grave concerns about the group’s military operations.
The RSF’s formation of a parallel government through the New Founding Sudan Charter raises serious questions regarding the implications for Sudan’s stability. While aiming for peace, experts warn this initiative may provoke further conflict, rather than resolution. International bodies like the UN and Sudan’s own leadership oppose the charter, indicating the complexity of governance amid ongoing violence.
Original Source: www.jurist.org
