Sudan’s RSF has formed an alliance with Abdelaziz al-Hilu’s faction, potentially strengthening its position in the ongoing war against the Sudanese Army. This partnership may offer critical territory and military support, although questions remain about the true motivations behind Hilu’s involvement. The evolving dynamics reveal a complex interplay of power, opportunism, and regional support, indicating the precarious nature of Sudanese politics.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan have formed a new alliance by signing a charter with former adversaries, which may enhance their position in the ongoing conflict against the regular army. Since April 2023, the RSF’s battle with the Sudanese Army has led to significant casualties and displacement of millions, alongside severe human rights violations. The RSF’s actions in Darfur have led to allegations of genocide by the former U.S. administration, raising the stakes in an already dire situation.
Abdelaziz al-Hilu, leader of a faction of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, unexpectedly signed the RSF charter while in Nairobi, establishing a crucial partnership. This alliance may provide the RSF, led by Mohamed Hamdan Daglo (Hemeti), with additional fighters and access to vital territory in Eastern Africa. Analysts believe this could significantly strengthen the RSF as it grapples with territorial losses to the Sudanese Army.
Despite having control over much of Darfur, the RSF struggles to secure its gains and faces the threat of losing Khartoum, the capital. Experts suggest that Hilu’s experienced fighters could provide necessary reinforcement at this critical time. Collaborative efforts between the RSF and Hilu’s faction could potentially unify forces controlling approximately 65% of Sudan.
Hilu commands territories in South Kordofan and Blue Nile, granting both groups strategic access to neighboring countries such as Libya and Chad. With much of the regional dynamics favoring the RSF, this partnership may be essential for their survival, especially with disrupted supply lines stemming from the west.
Despite the apparent mutual benefits, analysts question Hilu’s motivations, suggesting opportunism rather than true allegiance. Hilu may be seeking to protect his controlled areas from further violence and secure aid access, given the dire humanitarian situation. His recent actions have provoked mixed feelings among his supporters, who have suffered under RSF attacks.
Ultimately, while the charter represents a potential victory for Hilu, his trust in Hemeti remains uncertain. The RSF may lack genuine allies, relying on opportunistic collaborations that do not guarantee loyalty, highlighting the complex and fragile nature of alliances in Sudan’s conflict.
In summary, the recent alliance between the RSF and Abdelaziz al-Hilu could provide a significant boost to the RSF in its ongoing conflict against the Sudanese Army. Although the partnership promises military reinforcement and territorial advantage, Hilu’s motivations raise questions about the sustainability of this alliance. The geopolitical implications of this collaboration and the remaining complexities of Sudan’s conflict highlight the fragility of power dynamics in the region.
Original Source: tylerpaper.com
