The EU plans to review its agreement with Rwanda regarding critical raw materials due to Rwanda’s involvement in the DRC conflict. While avoiding immediate sanctions, EU officials stress the seriousness of border integrity. The memorandum’s review is influenced by concerns over illegal mineral exports amid regional instability, with historical ties between EU and Rwanda being reevaluated in this context.
The European Union (EU) plans to review its critical raw materials agreement with Rwanda due to the ongoing conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). EU foreign ministers decided not to impose immediate sanctions on Rwanda, opting for a political assessment of the situation instead. The DRC has faced significant unrest, particularly after Rwandan-backed M23 rebels captured territory, including the important city of Goma, leading to international backlash.
In response to the conflict, Belgium proposed a suspension of the EU’s agreement with Rwanda, a move supported by the European Parliament in a recent resolution. EU’s High Representative Kaja Kallas noted the need for Rwanda to withdraw its troops from the DRC as the Memorandum of Understanding concerning critical raw materials is under review. Kallas pointed out the seriousness of the situation, emphasizing the importance of territorial integrity for both the DRC and Ukraine.
The Memorandum of Understanding, signed in February last year, is part of the EU’s initiative to secure critical raw materials necessary for technologies like electric vehicles and microchips, aiming to reduce reliance on China. The deal, a component of the EU’s €300 billion Global Gateway initiative, allocates over €900 million to Rwanda and positions the country as a key player in global tantalum extraction and other critical resources.
Questions have arisen regarding the validity of Rwanda’s mineral exports, especially in light of allegations that they profit from DRC’s rich mining regions. Experts have suggested that mining data from Rwanda does not align with actual geological capabilities, with some asserting that minerals exported from Rwanda are illegally sourced from the DRC. This alleged exploitation has intensified scrutiny on the EU’s agreement with Rwanda as the conflict threatens regional stability.
Kallas’s statement marks a notable shift in the EU’s relationship with Rwanda and its leadership, known for maintaining friendly ties with many European leaders. Additionally, the EU has been supportive of Rwandan military efforts against terrorism in Mozambique, including recent funding allocations to enhance security and stability in the region.
The EU’s review of its raw materials deal with Rwanda reflects its response to ongoing conflicts in the DRC, emphasizing territorial integrity and international law. As the situation evolves, EU foreign ministers favor a cautious approach over direct sanctions, allowing for political assessment and dialogue. The outcome of this review could significantly impact not only EU-Rwanda relations but also the geopolitical landscape of critical resource supply chains.
Original Source: www.euronews.com
