The article outlines parallels between Trump’s past Taliban deal and his current approach to negotiations about Ukraine, emphasizing the dangers of excluding key stakeholders and prioritizing agreements over sustainable peace. It warns that Trump’s actions could undermine efforts for lasting stability in Ukraine, similar to the negative consequences seen in Afghanistan.
Five years ago this month, President Donald Trump’s administration signed a deal with the Taliban, facilitating the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan and enabling the militant group’s resurgence. During this period, I was in Kabul, witnessing the negotiations that were viewed as a betrayal of US sacrifices in the region. The agreement, largely shaped without Afghan government participation, omitted any safeguards for the reforms made in Afghan society, particularly regarding women’s rights. Although Trump was eager to finalize the deal, the invitation to the Taliban for a Camp David signing was ultimately rejected due to concerns over optics.
The primary demand from the US was a pledge from the Taliban not to harbor terrorists, while the Taliban agreed to refrain from attacking foreign forces during their withdrawal. While ending wars is commendable, the aftermath in Afghanistan, which has regressed significantly, highlights the pitfalls of hurried deal-making. As I observe Trump’s actions concerning Ukraine, parallels emerge regarding priorities in negotiations.
Recently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s engagement with Russian officials in Saudi Arabia echoes Trump’s previous tactics. Trump seems more focused on reaching an agreement than on including vital stakeholders like Ukraine. Although he acknowledges the devastation of the war and the toll on Russian troops, sustainable peace must involve all parties, especially Kyiv, which is now sidelined.
Trump’s public comments indicate a willingness to make concessions favorable to Russia, further complicating the situation for Ukraine, which was invaded. He has suggested that Ukraine should consider territorial compromises, a notion echoed by Russian officials during negotiations. Unlike the fragmented Afghan forces post-US withdrawal, the Ukrainian military remains disciplined and equipped, resisting yielding territory.
While ending conflict is commendable, Trump’s approach threatens to dismantle the collective efforts of the US, Europe, and Ukraine aimed at sustaining peace and independence. His disregard for including Ukraine in crucial discussions risks further destabilizing the region, undermining years of struggle against external aggression.
In summary, Trump’s previous deal with the Taliban serves as a cautionary tale for current negotiations regarding Ukraine. His prioritization of quick agreements over inclusive dialogue risks repeating past mistakes, neglecting the necessity of sustainable peace that accommodates all involved parties. The current sidelining of Ukraine in discussions with Russia could lead not only to detrimental outcomes for Ukrainian sovereignty but also to broader regional instability.
Original Source: www.thenationalnews.com
