Indonesia is contemplating withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, following the US exit. Officials critique the need for emissions reductions while major polluters, like the US, withdraw. Despite securing $20 billion for transitioning away from coal via the JETP deal, slow fund disbursement and ongoing coal expansion raise questions about its commitment to climate goals. Activists warn against potential economic repercussions for neglecting climate obligations.
Indonesia, a significant greenhouse gas emitter, is contemplating withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, a move previously made by the US. Hashim Djojohadikusumo, Indonesia’s climate envoy, questioned compliance with the agreement in light of the US’s decision. He highlighted the stark difference in carbon emissions per capita between the two countries and criticized calls for Indonesia to reduce coal reliance without considering the economic implications.
Several Indonesian officials have expressed concerns regarding the fairness of requiring their country to decrease emissions under the Paris Agreement while the US has withdrawn. Energy Minister Bahlil Lahadalia warned that reduced US participation could jeopardize international financial support for Indonesia’s renewable energy projects, hindering their transition. This stance could force Indonesia to reconsider its role within the accord.
In 2022, Indonesia entered a Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) deal, securing $20 billion for its clean energy transition. However, the slow release of funds has prompted officials to question the viability of their commitments to the Paris Agreement amid ongoing coal plant developments. Indonesia’s focus may shift towards achieving greater energy self-reliance by mixing coal and renewables instead of complete energy transition to renewables.
Despite pledging to retire coal plants by 2050, the Indonesian government continues to expand its coal infrastructure. The Energy Ministry maintains plans to build new coal facilities, reflecting economic priorities over climate objectives. Officials emphasize not committing “economic suicide,” indicating a reluctance to fully abandon coal in the energy mix.
Amid severe consequences from climate change, Indonesia has faced substantial climate-related incidents requiring action. Critics argue that the government’s response to climate change shows ignorance of its urgency, urging prioritization of climate justice. These calls underscore the ethical obligations Indonesia holds as a major coal producer and exporter.
Environmental advocates emphasize the potential reputational and economic risks if Indonesia opts out of climate commitments. Access to international financing is critical for the nation’s renewable energy goals. The country would require approximately $2.4 trillion for its transition, indicating the importance of retaining credibility in global climate finance discussions.
Indonesia’s deliberation over possibly exiting the Paris Agreement stems from perceived injustices in global emissions responsibilities. While officials highlight the economic and investment implications of reducing coal use, advocates underscore the urgency of climate action for both environmental and human justice. Ultimately, Indonesia faces significant pressure to navigate between its economic aspirations and the necessary commitments to global climate agreements.
Original Source: www.eco-business.com
