Lebanon has rejected Israel’s request to remain in five positions in southern Lebanon after a ceasefire deadline. Berri emphasized the need for US enforcement of the withdrawal while Lebanon establishes a new government amidst waning Hezbollah influence. UN officials stress the importance of compliance with Resolution 1701 for lasting peace.
Lebanon’s parliamentary speaker, Nabih Berri, announced on Thursday that the country has rejected Israel’s request to maintain a presence in five southern locations following the February 18 deadline for the ceasefire agreement. The fragile truce, established on November 27, ended over a year of conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and has faced accusations of violations from both sides. According to the ceasefire agreement, Lebanese military forces were set to deploy in the south together with UN peacekeepers as the Israeli army withdrew over a 60-day period, now extended until February 18.
Berri reported that Hezbollah’s positions near the Israeli border were also expected to be vacated during this time. Following discussions with US officials, including ambassador Lisa Johnson and Major General Jasper Jeffers, Berri stated that he had conveyed Lebanon’s complete rejection of Israel’s plan to remain at specific points. He also clarified that extending the deadline for Israel’s withdrawal was not a point for discussion.
Berri emphasized that enforcing the withdrawal of Israeli forces is the responsibility of the Americans, asserting that failure to do so would lead to significant setbacks for the Lebanese government. In recent developments, Lebanon’s Prime Minister formed a new government as Hezbollah’s influence wanes, ending a prolonged period of caretaker governance.
UN representatives have consistently urged both Israel and Lebanon to uphold their commitments to the ceasefire agreement. Farhan Haq, the deputy spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, underscored that effective redeployment by the Lebanese Armed Forces and the withdrawal of Israeli forces is vital. He reiterated the necessity for both parties to avoid actions that might escalate tensions or jeopardize civilian safety, advocating for full compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 1701 to ensure lasting peace and stability in the region.
Lebanon’s refusal of Israel’s demand to remain in southern locations signifies a potential escalation in tensions ahead of the February 18 deadline. The continuous call by the UN for both sides to honor ceasefire commitments highlights the precarious nature of the current situation. The responsibility for enforcing the withdrawal largely lies with US mediators, emphasizing the international dimension of the conflict and the importance of effective governance in Lebanon.
Original Source: www.bryantimes.com
