Amman’s streets echo public opposition to Trump’s Gaza plan, with protests emphasizing rejection of forced resettlement. King Abdullah II finds support from various Jordanian factions as he meets Trump, reflecting internal concerns about potential destabilization in the region. King Abdullah’s efforts in D.C. reveal the complexities of balancing diplomatic protocol and national sentiment.
In Amman, a clear public sentiment against displacement is reflected in protest signs reading, “No to displacement,” and “No to resettlement.” This opposition responds to Donald Trump’s controversial proposal to relocate Gaza’s residents forcibly, pushing Jordan and Egypt to absorb them. The majority of Jordanian society backs King Abdullah II’s stance against this suggested population transfer, emphasizing national solidarity.
Ahead of King Abdullah II’s visit to Washington on February 11, various groups, including leftists and Islamists, publicly expressed their support for his position. Although the meeting with President Trump was highly anticipated, the king’s apprehension in dealing with the American leader generated discomfort within Jordan. His efforts to maintain decorum amidst pressure created an awkward atmosphere during the press conference.
A 40-year-old NGO worker, under the pseudonym Samer, shared his unease over the American administration’s potential endorsement of Gazan deportation and its implications for regional stability. There is a prevailing fear that if implemented, Trump’s proposals could further destabilize the Middle East; however, some hold onto hope that these plans might not come to fruition.
The article explores the tension surrounding Trump’s Gaza plan and its implications for Jordan’s monarchy. Public opposition in Jordan emphasizes a desire to maintain national sovereignty against forced resettlement. King Abdullah II’s careful navigation of diplomatic relations highlights the delicate balance needed to address both domestic and international pressures. The situation reflects broader anxieties about regional stability amid U.S. foreign policy decisions.
Original Source: www.lemonde.fr
