Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian asserted the country’s intention to enhance its nuclear infrastructure in response to potential Israeli attacks. This stance follows warnings from US President Trump regarding military action against Iran. Iranian officials emphasized their commitment to retaliate against any aggression, suggesting that conflict could lead to significant regional unrest.
Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian declared the nation’s commitment to significantly expand its nuclear infrastructure in response to any potential attacks from adversaries. This statement coincided with reports from the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, suggesting an Israeli pre-emptive strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities may be imminent. Pezeshkian emphasized that if Israel were to target Iran’s facilities, the country would dramatically increase its nuclear capabilities, stating, “If you strike a hundred of those we will build a thousand other ones.” He underscored the inability to strike at the nation’s resolve or its personnel despite physical attacks on infrastructure.
US President Donald Trump recently indicated a willingness to use military actions against Iran, suggesting he would prefer negotiations over conflict. His remarks hinted at a greater probability of Israeli military involvement bolstered by US support. Trump noted, “Everyone thinks Israel, with our help or our approval, will go in and bomb the hell out of them. I would prefer that not to happen.” This reflects the tensions surrounding the Iranian nuclear issue and the potential for escalating military confrontation in the region.
In response to Trump’s statements, Iran’s air force commander, Hamid Vahedi, reinforced the defensive nature of Iran’s military strategy. Vahedi articulated that the country would respond decisively to any aggression, stating that Iran’s doctrine is defensive but will retaliate forcefully against attacks. This statement signifies the seriousness with which Iran views external threats, particularly from Israel and the US.
Media speculations indicate that an Israeli strike on Iran might be linked to previous Iranian missile operations, such as the “Operation True Promise 2” conducted in October. This operation reportedly targeted key figures in the militant group Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which suggests that Israel is responding to perceived provocations and threats from Iran.
Iran maintains that any assault on its nuclear sites would trigger a swift retaliation leading to widespread regional conflict. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi deemed an attack on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure as a potential blunder for the US, stating it would represent “one of the biggest historical mistakes the US could make.” This reflects Tehran’s view of its nuclear program as a core component of national defense and regional power dynamics.
In summary, Iran’s leadership has publicly committed to expanding its nuclear capabilities if faced with military aggression, particularly from Israel. The potential for conflict is heightened by recent comments from US President Trump and the Iranian defense establishment, indicating a readiness to respond to threats. The backdrop of historical military actions, such as the missile operations targeting significant figures, further complicates the geopolitical landscape. As tensions mount, the prospect of a military confrontation remains a pressing concern in the region.
Original Source: www.firstpost.com
