Lebanon has rejected Israel’s demand to maintain positions in five southern locations post-ceasefire. Speaker Nabih Berri confirmed that both Lebanon’s leadership is against this Israeli proposal, emphasizing U.S. responsibility in ensuring compliance with the withdrawal deadline. The ceasefire has been questioned by both sides amid a transition in Lebanon’s government.
Lebanon’s parliament speaker, Nabih Berri, has officially rejected Israel’s demand to maintain a presence at five specific locations in southern Lebanon following a ceasefire agreement. Berri reported that the U.S., a key mediator, informed him that Israel would withdraw from certain occupied villages by February 18 but intended to remain at these critical sites. He confirmed that both he and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun fully oppose this proposal.
Berri’s statements came after discussions with U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon, Lisa Johnson, and Major General Jasper Jeffers, who co-chairs a committee focusing on ceasefire compliance. He strongly denied any negotiations extending the deadline for Israel’s withdrawal, emphasizing that it is the responsibility of the U.S. to ensure compliance with the withdrawal timeline.
Lebanon’s Prime Minister recently appointed a new government, indicating a shift following the decline in influence of Hezbollah, which marks the end of a caretaker government phase. Since the ceasefire began on November 27, both Israel and Hezbollah have accused each other of breaking terms, complicating the peace effort in the region.
The stipulations of the ceasefire called for the Lebanese military and UN peacekeepers to replace Israeli forces in the south, with Hezbollah also expected to withdraw from its positions near the border. This complex situation remains tense as both parties navigate the aftermath of more than a year of conflict.
Lebanon’s firm stance against Israeli demands signals a critical point in ongoing negotiations regarding military presence in southern Lebanon. The need for U.S. enforcement emphasizes the delicate nature of the ceasefire agreement, while tensions remain high following prolonged hostilities. The current political landscape, including the formation of a new Lebanese government, will influence future interactions between Lebanon and Israel.
Original Source: 24newshd.tv
