Egypt and Jordan confront challenges amid potential U.S. aid cuts inspired by Trump’s Palestinian displacement proposals. While King Abdullah II has made concessions to Trump, both nations firmly oppose his suggestions and seek alternative funding avenues due to reliance on U.S. financial support. Potential demographic shifts and economic strains are critical concerns as they reconsider their strategic alliances in light of these pressures.
Egypt and Jordan are under pressure due to potential U.S. aid cuts and Donald Trump’s proposals to displace Palestinians from Gaza into their territories. Analysts warn this could reshape regional alliances, especially after King Abdullah II’s attempt to appease Trump by offering to accept sick children from Gaza. Despite this gesture, both nations emphasize their refusal to comply with Trump’s suggestions and plan to counter his initiatives during an upcoming Arab Summit in February.
US foreign aid has been crucial for both countries, particularly Egypt, which has received over $87 billion since 1946, mainly for military purposes since the 1979 Camp David Accords. Jordan benefits from $1.45 billion annually, significantly impacting its economy and stability. However, recent cuts to Jordan’s economic aid amounting to $770 million from USAID have strained its public sectors.
The U.S. leverages aid to ensure both Egypt and Jordan remain aligned with its interests, as they act as stabilizing forces in the region. Egypt facilitates U.S. military logistics, while Jordan serves as a critical ally against various threats. Analysts suggest that diminishing U.S. aid may push these countries to seek alternative funding sources from Gulf allies or even competitors like China and Russia.
Jordan faces existential risks due to Trump’s ideas, as absorbing an additional million Palestinians could fundamentally alter the demographic and national identity. There is speculation that Gulf Cooperation Council countries might step in to fill any funding voids left by U.S. aid cuts. Nonetheless, these nations may struggle to cover the gaps entirely, possibly requiring social and governmental austerity measures.
Ultimately, the implications of these developments are significant for both Egypt and Jordan, requiring them to weigh their options carefully in an increasingly complex regional landscape dominated by foreign aid dynamics.
In summary, Egypt and Jordan face strategic challenges due to potential aid loss linked to U.S. policy on Palestinian displacement. The countries’ historical reliance on American aid for military and economic stability may lead them to pursue new funding sources. With growing concerns over national identity and stability, the outcomes of these policies will have profound implications for regional dynamics and their political landscapes.
Original Source: www.aljazeera.com
