The assassination of Hezbollah fighter Abbas Haidar highlights the increasing violence from Israel, intertwined with US goals to reshape the political landscape in Lebanon and eliminate Hezbollah’s influence. This represents a broader strategy of suppressing resistance movements across the region, with the implications of US involvement becoming ever clearer in the aftermath of these attacks.
The recent murder of Hezbollah fighter Abbas Haidar and his daughters showcases the escalating brutality from the Israeli military against Lebanon. Haidar, known for his significant role in ambushes against Israeli soldiers, was the target of a violent act reflecting a broader strategy of revenge. This moment coincided suspiciously with the visit of US officials, indicating a deeper connection between US actions and the ongoing violence in Lebanon.
The US aims to replace Hamas with a compliant Palestinian leadership, as seen in coordinated efforts between the US and the Palestinian Authority (PA) to suppress resistance. While Hamas successfully counters these efforts, the PA continues to act as an enforcer for Israel through violent raids, leading to increasing concerns about US involvement in Lebanon. The assassination of resistance figures in Lebanon symbolizes a continuation of this strategy, exacerbating tensions in the region.
Ben Netanyahu’s symbolic gift to Trump—an olive tree trunk mounted as a Golden Pager—serves as a painful reminder of Israel’s aggression against Lebanon’s heritage. Meanwhile, US Middle East envoy Morgan Ortagus made provocative statements about Hezbollah’s defeat, undermining its political presence in Lebanon. This rhetoric fuels demands for a government excluding Hezbollah, undermining the country’s political balance.
The US has persistently manipulated Lebanon’s political structure, ensuring that Hezbollah remains sidelined. US representatives openly suggest a future without Hezbollah in government, drawing parallels with past failed promises of a stable Middle East. The underlying objective remains clear: to diminish Hezbollah’s influence and reshape Lebanon’s landscape according to US-Israeli interests.
The situation continues to deteriorate as Israeli operations target resistance families with brutal tactics, indicating a strategy aimed at completely dismantling Hezbollah’s support. Overall, the Lebanese army’s inaction against these schemes raises questions about the stability of the country. As attacks escalate, not just through conventional military means, but also through information warfare involving technology, the landscape of resistance is under siege.
The evolution of social engineering campaigns against resistance groups signifies a shift in strategy among tech giants, which have moved from fostering liberal values to supporting aggressive neoconservative agendas. This change further complicates the situation, as technologies that can be used for surveillance and warfare become intertwined with capitalist motives. The unfolding chaos amidst these political and social dynamics poses a significant threat to the resilience of national identities in Lebanon and Palestine.
The article addresses the multifaceted conflict in Lebanon linked to broader regional tensions involving the US, Israel, and Hezbollah. Examining the circumstances surrounding the assassination of Hezbollah’s figure and US diplomatic maneuvers, the piece provides insights into the ongoing hostilities and ideological battles. It frames these events within a historical context of Israeli occupation and US foreign policy strategies aimed at reshaping Middle Eastern politics.
The escalating violence in Lebanon, underscored by the assassination of Hezbollah fighters and the aggressive rhetoric from US officials, signifies troubling developments in the region. Lebanon’s political equilibrium faces severe challenges as efforts to suppress Hezbollah intensify, potentially destabilizing the nation. The intertwined tactics of military action and technological warfare illustrate a broader campaign against resistance forces, demonstrating the complexity and urgency of the situation.
Original Source: www.presstv.ir
