Lt Gen Abdelfattah El Burhan has firmly stated that the NCP and the pro-democracy Tagadom coalition will not return to power in Sudan. He emphasized the need for genuine political competition while denying any negotiations with the RSF unless they withdraw from occupied territories. El Burhan also outlined plans for a caretaker government composed of national competencies to navigate the transitional period amidst ongoing conflicts.
Lt Gen Abdelfattah El Burhan, the head of Sudan’s Transitional Sovereignty Council, has faced backlash from various political factions after stating that the dissolved Islamist National Congress Party (NCP) and the pro-democracy Tagadom coalition will not regain power in Sudan. El Burhan accused both groups of supporting violence against Sudanese citizens, emphasizing that any future political competition must be genuine and not an extension of past governance that resulted in civil strife. He made clear that negotiation with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) is off the table unless they withdraw from occupied areas and cease hostilities.
During a recent consultation in Port Sudan, El Burhan announced plans for an independent government formed from national competencies to address governance issues in the transitional phase. He stated that necessary constitutional amendments are underway, which would ultimately lead to the selection of a prime minister, ensuring that governance remains free from external influences. This new government may be termed a caretaker or war government, indicating its critical and transitional nature.
In reaction to El Burhan’s strong assertions, leaders from the NCP decried his remarks as attempts to ally himself with weaker factions, declaring they will not concede power without a fight. They stressed their commitment to regain control through electoral means, invoking the significant sacrifices made for their political presence. Trusted voices within the NCP expressed concern that El Burhan’s criticisms were unjustified in the current challenging climate, reaffirming their resolve against returning to subordination under any regime.
The discussion surrounding El Burhan’s statements has sparked widespread agitation among the NCP members. Some political analysts argue his comments reflect deeper anxieties about the Islamist movement’s influence in the military. Observers also emphasize that El Burhan’s remarks place responsibility for the ongoing conflict squarely on the shoulders of the NCP and allied factions, framing his narrative as one designed to consolidate power while addressing the legitimacy of past regimes.
In the aftermath of Sudan’s recent political upheaval, the transitional leadership, helmed by Lt Gen Abdelfattah El Burhan, is attempting to redefine the country’s political landscape. The National Congress Party (NCP), previously ruling under Omar Al Bashir, was dissolved in 2019 following a popular uprising. The emergence of the Tagadom coalition, consisting of various pro-democracy groups, including former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok’s agenda, marks an attempt to unify the political front against ongoing conflict between the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and the RSF. El Burhan’s remarks signal a stringent stance against these factions, aiming to prevent their resurgence in governance.
El Burhan’s declarations have illuminated the precariousness of Sudan’s political environment, casting doubt on the return of previous regimes and emphasizing accountability for violence. The announcement of an independent government is a significant step that could influence future negotiations and political stability. As tensions rise among the political factions, the coming weeks may prove crucial for Sudan’s quest towards democracy and civil peace.
Original Source: www.dabangasudan.org
