Javier Milei, the President of Argentina, has announced plans to withdraw from the WHO, following a similar move by Donald Trump. This decision cites “profound differences” over WHO’s pandemic guidelines. While the U.S. withdrawal could significantly impact the organization’s funding, Argentina’s contribution is relatively minor. The withdrawal requires congressional approval, which may face opposition domestically, paralleling sentiments in Italy about possibly leaving the WHO as well.
Javier Milei, Argentina’s President and ally of former U.S. President Donald Trump, announced plans to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) citing “profound differences” in response to the organization’s COVID-19 guidance. This decision follows Trump’s recent executive order to exit WHO, blaming its pandemic responses for unprecedented global shutdowns. While the U.S. represents a significant loss to WHO funding, Argentina’s withdrawal, contributing approximately $8-$9 million annually, has a relatively minor impact.
A representative for Milei stated that Argentina will not allow an international body to infringe upon its sovereignty or health policies. However, it should be noted that the WHO lacks legal authority over a nation’s decisions related to health crises. Although Milei’s decision requires congressional approval, similar sentiment regarding WHO is echoed in Italy, where Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini has proposed a bill to exit the organization.
Unlike Trump’s previous attempt to withdraw, which was halted by President Biden, any new move must adhere to the U.S. charter requiring a one-year notice for withdrawal. The complexities surrounding Milei’s decision highlight potential resistance domestically, as his government navigates the need for congressional validation. As political landscapes shift in other countries, it remains to be observed how many may consider following suit with WHO withdrawals.
WHO has expressed regret regarding the withdrawal of the U.S. without commenting on Argentina’s recent announcement. As it stands, the international health community watches to see how these developments could affect global health governance moving forward.
The article discusses the implications of Argentina’s decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization, led by President Javier Milei, who aligns with Donald Trump’s views on the organization’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The context highlights the growing sentiment against WHO’s influence, particularly among populist leaders who advocate for national sovereignty over international health mandates. Furthermore, it examines the potential impacts of these withdrawals on WHO’s future and funding capabilities, especially following the U.S. withdrawal.
In summary, Argentina’s decision to exit the WHO reflects a broader trend among certain nations questioning the organization’s authority, particularly regarding pandemic management. The potential political ramifications in Argentina and Italy signal a growing movement that may impact international health policy and governance. As these leaders confront internal challenges, the future of such withdrawals will determine the operational capacity of global health organizations.
Original Source: www.foxbusiness.com
