Argentina has announced its exit from the World Health Organization, reflecting deep disagreements, particularly regarding the organization’s COVID-19 management. This decision aligns with U.S. actions under President Trump and emphasizes national sovereignty and local health policy autonomy. Milei’s administration criticizes WHO guidelines as detrimental to national interests.
In a significant move, Argentina’s President Javier Milei has ordered the country to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), citing “profound differences” with the agency. This action comes in alignment with U.S. President Donald Trump’s previous steps to exit the WHO. Argentina’s anticipated financial contribution of approximately $8 million to the WHO’s annual budget is marginal relative to the organization’s $6.9 billion budget, but the exit signifies a growing trend of fragmentation in global health collaboration.
The Argentine government framed its decision as a reaction to WHO’s management during the COVID-19 pandemic, which they claim resulted in unprecedented global shutdowns. Presidential spokesperson Manuel Adorni emphasized the country’s commitment to sovereignty, stating, “We will not allow an international organization to intervene in our sovereignty, especially in our health.” In this regard, although WHO guidelines are non-binding, Argentina has previously ignored them along with several other nations.
Following the announcement, WHO indicated it is reviewing Argentina’s departure. Adorni noted no specific timeline was provided for when the withdrawal would take effect, criticizing the WHO for its alleged dependency on political influences from certain member nations. The WHO is recognized as the primary body responsible for coordinating global responses to health emergencies, including diseases like Ebola and COVID-19.
Milei’s critique extends to the stringent lockdown measures imposed by his predecessor, which he asserts caused economic detriment and served as a tool of repression. Reflecting his stance on personal freedoms, he tweeted, “LONG LIVE FREEDOM,” disparaging the UN health authority. His administration also refrained from endorsing a WHO pandemic management agreement the previous year, citing similar sovereignty concerns.
This announcement aligns with Milei’s plans to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, D.C., later this month. However, it remains unconfirmed if he will meet with President Trump during this visit.
This article discusses Argentina’s recent decision to exit the World Health Organization, a significant event in the realm of global health governance. The withdrawal is motivated by perceived disagreements with WHO’s approach to health management during the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting a broader trend where countries prioritize national sovereignty over international health guidelines. The decision raises questions about the future of global health collaboration, especially in light of ongoing health crises.
Argentina’s withdrawal from the WHO mirrors a broader skepticism towards international health organizations, particularly in the context of national sovereignty. Spearheaded by President Milei, the move reflects concerns over how global health policies can impact domestic governance and economic stability. As countries increasingly choose independence over collaboration, the implications for international health security could be significant.
Original Source: jakartaglobe.id
