Zanu PF suspended two MPs for allegedly inciting factionalism, amid a power struggle over President Mnangagwa’s term extension. The disciplinary actions indicate a severe internal clash, particularly against the backdrop of Mnangagwa and Chiwenga’s competing interests, which could reshape party dynamics. Historical trends suggest a recurrence of past political crises.
Zanu PF in Masvingo Province has suspended MPs Benjamin Ganyiwa from Gutu East and Roy Bhila from Chiredzi North for allegedly promoting factionalism within the party. This action coincides with an intensifying leadership struggle over President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s potential two-year term extension despite constitutional limits. His allies advocate for this change, while opposition is emerging from party members, including Mnangagwa’s deputy, Constantino Chiwenga, who favors maintaining the existing term limits.
Robson Mavhenyengwa, Zanu PF’s Masvingo chairman, highlighted that Ganyiwa convened a private meeting with party members without notifying key leadership, which violated party protocol. Bhila, who was removed as deputy industry and commerce minister under Mnangagwa’s administration, was also present at this meeting. Mavhenyengwa disclosed that Ganyiwa faces four specific disciplinary charges, leading to prohibition orders barring both lawmakers from engaging in party activities.
The internal conflict within Zanu PF centers on President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s leadership and the potential extension of his term. This situation is exacerbated by factions that either support the president or align with Chiwenga, indicating fractures within the party. Historical parallels draw attention to previous political instability, particularly leading to the 2017 military coup. The outcomes of current disciplinary actions may set vital precedents for the party’s future structure and unity.
The recent suspensions of MPs Ganyiwa and Bhila reflect escalating tensions within Zanu PF as factions vie for power amid proposed changes to party leadership terms. The disciplinary procedures initiated by the party’s hierarchy signal a significant crackdown on dissent. As internal divisions intensify, the party’s direction may shift dramatically, hinging on the outcomes of these disciplinary measures and the responses from rival factions.
Original Source: www.zimlive.com
