Argentina is withdrawing from the World Health Organization due to “profound differences” in health management, particularly after enduring the longest lockdown. This decision aligns with the United States’ earlier withdrawal, citing political influence and financial disparities in contributions to WHO. The Argentine government, led by the far-right party, is reevaluating its international commitments.
Argentina has announced its decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), following a similar move by the United States. President Javier Milei has assigned Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to oversee the withdrawal process. This decision stems from claimed “profound differences” in health governance between Argentina and the WHO, as the country endured the longest lockdown globally during the previous administration.
A significant criticism from the Argentine government is that the WHO has compromised its autonomy due to political maneuvers by various nations. In light of this, Werthein’s team is currently evaluating the legal consequences of leaving the organization. The ruling far-right party, La Libertad Avanza, argues that Argentina’s financial commitments to several international bodies do not bring advantages to the nation.
Argentina’s withdrawal aligns with a prior executive order from then-US President Trump, which criticized the WHO for its response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other health issues. Trump noted the organization’s lack of reform and independence, citing disproportionate financial demands from the U.S. compared to other nations. The WHO, founded in 1948, plays a central role in global health by coordinating efforts and establishing health norms.
The organization is financed through mandatory contributions from member states and voluntary donations, with a total budget around $6.8 billion, of which the United States contributes roughly 20%. The implications of Argentina’s exit from the WHO could impact its health policies and international health collaboration, echoing broader discontent with global health governance amid the pandemic.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is the UN’s premier health agency, created to enhance global health standards and provide support during health crises. It is funded by mandatory member fees and voluntary contributions. Recently, the agency has faced scrutiny from various countries regarding its pandemic response and financial structure, contributing to a growing trend of withdrawals from its membership by nations dissatisfied with its operations.
In summary, Argentina’s decision to exit the WHO reflects notable discontent with how the organization operates, especially in relation to health governance during the pandemic. This withdrawal, following the U.S. exit, highlights a significant critique of multilateral health bodies’ effectiveness and financial demands. The future of Argentina’s health policy and international cooperation might be significantly influenced by this decision.
Original Source: baohaiduong.vn
