Argentina’s President Javier Milei has decided to withdraw the country from the WHO, citing serious disagreements over healthcare management during the COVID-19 pandemic. This follows similar moves by the United States, which formally began its withdrawal under President Trump. The actions reflect increasing scrutiny over international healthcare policies and management.
Argentina’s President Javier Milei has announced the nation’s withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) due to significant disagreements over healthcare management policies. This decision was communicated by presidential spokesperson Manuel Adorni during a press conference where he articulated that President Milei directed Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to facilitate the withdrawal based on these critical issues, particularly those revealed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adorni cited concerns over the lengthy quarantine measures imposed by the previous administration, suggesting an over-reliance on external political influences affecting healthcare decisions.
In parallel, the United States previously commenced its separation from the WHO. On January 21, under the leadership of President Donald Trump, an executive order was signed to initiate the exit from the organization, nullifying an attempt by former President Joe Biden to reverse this decision, which had started with a letter dated January 20, 2021, aimed at rejoining the WHO.
The withdrawal of Argentina from the WHO marks a significant shift in its public health policy, reflecting growing tensions around international healthcare governance, especially following the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. As countries continue to grapple with the pandemic’s aftermath, decisions like these may indicate a desire for greater sovereignty over national health policies. This situation parallels earlier actions taken by the United States, highlighting a potential trend among nations questioning the WHO’s influence.
In summary, Argentina’s withdrawal from the WHO, as announced by President Milei, echoes a broader skepticism regarding international health organizations, further demonstrated by the United States’ prior actions. This decision stems from profound differences in healthcare management philosophies and criticism of past pandemic responses, which could influence future health governance in both countries.
Original Source: newsukraine.rbc.ua
