Argentina announced its withdrawal from the WHO, following the US’s similar action. President Javier Milei cited ‘deep differences’ with the organization regarding its handling of health issues, particularly COVID-19. Concerns were also raised about WHO’s political influence and management practices, reflecting a broader trend of discontent with international health governance.
On February 5, 2025, Argentina’s government announced its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO). This decision came shortly after the United States made a similar move under President Donald Trump. President Javier Milei directed Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to execute the exit, signaling growing discontent with the WHO’s effectiveness in handling health crises, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic.
Milei, a libertarian who aligns closely with Trump, criticized the WHO for its pandemic management and cited ‘deep differences’ concerning the organization’s operations. Press spokesperson Manuel Adorni referenced Argentina’s extended lockdown during the preceding left-wing administration as a significant factor motivating the withdrawal. Additionally, he raised concerns over the WHO’s alleged susceptibility to political pressures from various nations.
This action echoes Trump’s prior criticisms of the WHO, where he condemned the organization for what he described as inadequate responses to global health challenges and excessive demands for funding from member states. As the largest financial contributor, the US’s grievances about perceived financial inequity have influenced other nations’ views, leading to Argentina’s decision.
This recent development in Argentina reflects a broader trend of discontent among certain governments regarding international health organizations. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted significant challenges, prompting countries to reassess their relationships with the WHO. This decision is particularly influenced by political ideologies that favor less governmental intervention, as seen in Milei’s administration, which prioritizes economic freedom and skepticism towards multilateral institutions.
Argentina’s withdrawal from the WHO aligns with a rising trend of criticism against international health governance, driven by political shifts and concerns over pandemic responses. This move raises questions about the future role of the WHO and the potential impacts on global health collaboration. The decision reflects a growing skepticism among nations about international institutions’ ability to manage health crises effectively, especially in light of recent experiences during the pandemic.
Original Source: indianexpress.com
