Argentina has withdrawn from the WHO, following the United States’ example under Donald Trump. President Javier Milei’s decision reflects significant disagreements with the organization, particularly its pandemic handling, which he criticized as unscientific. Despite some support for international cooperation, the Milei administration emphasizes the need to reassess the WHO’s effectiveness.
Argentina has officially announced its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), closely following a similar move by the United States under former President Donald Trump. This decision was confirmed by Manuel Adorni, spokesperson for President Javier Milei, citing profound disagreements with the organization.
President Milei has historically opposed international bodies’ influence on national sovereignty, particularly regarding health policies. He criticized the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting what he described as “unsubstantiated lockdowns.” The Argentine presidency issued a statement claiming that the WHO promoted ineffective lockdown measures lacking scientific backing.
In a recent post on social media platform X, Milei referred to the WHO as the “ideologists of the caveman lockdown” and labeled the organization a “nefarious entity” responsible for implementing an unprecedented social control experiment. The government maintains that Argentina does not depend on WHO funding, thereby ensuring that healthcare services will not be compromised by this separation.
While some health officials, like Buenos Aires Health Minister Nicolás Kreplak, assert the necessity of international health collaboration, the Milei administration is resolute in its perspective that organizations such as the WHO need critical reassessment regarding their relevance and efficacy. The WHO is currently evaluating Argentina’s departure and the implications of Milei’s comments.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations focused on international public health. Governments often engage with the WHO to navigate global health challenges. Argentina’s withdrawal reflects growing tension between national sovereignty and international health governance, particularly following global criticisms of WHO’s pandemic response.
Argentina’s exit from the WHO mirrors the past decision of the United States and reflects wider sentiments regarding national control in health matters. President Javier Milei’s criticism of the WHO’s pandemic strategy underscores a significant ideological shift in public health policy from relying on international organizations to prioritizing national sovereignty. The future implications of this decision for Argentina’s health system and international relations remain to be seen.
Original Source: www.gamereactor.eu
