Argentina, under President Javier Milei, will exit the WHO, citing significant differences in health management, especially during the COVID-19 crisis. This decision mirrors the U.S. withdrawal initiated by Trump, reflecting a trend of nations prioritizing sovereignty over international cooperation. Milei’s austerity measures have complicated Argentina’s economic situation, even as the country achieved a substantial trade surplus.
Argentina’s President Javier Milei announced that the country will withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), following the United States’ similar decision last month. The rationale for this withdrawal is rooted in what the government describes as “deep differences” regarding health management, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Milei’s team emphasized Argentina’s intention to uphold its sovereignty and implement tailored local policies, free from external influence. The spokesman noted this shift would also facilitate increased resource availability for the country.
Milei, an “anarcho-capitalist” and supporter of former President Donald Trump, echoed criticisms concerning the WHO’s pandemic handling. Trump initiated the U.S. withdrawal during his presidency, claiming that the agency was detrimental to American interests. The U.S. previously provided substantial funding to the WHO, and its absence may adversely affect international health initiatives, raising concerns over future global health resources.
Since taking office in late 2023, Milei has pursued strict austerity measures intending to achieve a zero budget deficit. However, these policies have reportedly exacerbated poverty for millions. Despite these challenges, Argentina achieved its largest-ever trade surplus in 2024, attributed partly to a decline in imports and reduced domestic spending. Milei notably became the first foreign leader to visit Trump since the latter’s election victory, signaling a strategic alignment between their administrations.
The decision to withdraw from the WHO is part of a broader wave of skepticism toward international health agencies, particularly in response to their actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various countries have criticized the WHO’s pandemic management, arguing that it infringes on national sovereignty. Argentina’s exit reflects not only domestic political strategy under President Milei but also the influence of populist sentiments seen in other parts of the world. The implications of such withdrawals can severely challenge global health collaboration, especially as funding from major contributors like the U.S. diminishes.
In summary, Argentina’s withdrawal from the WHO, closely aligned with U.S. actions, stems from disagreements over health management during the pandemic and a desire to assert national sovereignty. This move may hinder global health efforts as funding constraints become apparent. Milei’s austerity measures signify a drastic shift in economic policy, with both positive and negative outcomes observed in Argentina’s economic landscape. As the global health environment evolves, such departures raise crucial questions about cooperation and resource allocation among nations.
Original Source: www.ndtv.com
